مدل بلوغ صندوق‌های سرمایه‌گذاری خطرپذیر شرکتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه سیاست فناوری و نوآوری، مؤسسه تحقیقات سیاست علمی کشور، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه تأمین مالی و اقتصاد علم، فناوری و نوآوری، مؤسسه تحقیقات سیاست علمی کشور، تهران، ایران

3 استاد، گروه مدیریت فناوری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.

10.22034/jstp.2026.12254.2022

چکیده

در سال‌های اخیر، سرمایه‌گذاری خطرپذیر شرکتی (CVC) به‌عنوان بازوی تأمین مالی نوآوری شرکت‌های بزرگ مورد توجه این شرکت‌ها و سیاست‌گذاران بوده است. در ایران نیز با تصویب دستورالعمل و اساسنامه نمونه تأسیس و نحوه فعالیت صندوق‌های پژوهش و فناوری سرمایه‌گذاری خطرپذیر شرکتی (1399) و قانون جهش تولید دانش‌بنیان (1401)، روند شکل‌گیری این صندوق‌ها رشدی فزاینده یافته است. اما، ماهیت این نوع سرمایه‌گذاری با پیگیری هم‌زمان اهداف مالی و راهبردی، ارزیابی عملکرد آن‌ها را با چالش‌های مفهومی و عملیاتی مواجه کرده است. هدف این پژوهش که با روش‌شناسی علم طراحی  انجام شده است، توسعه مدل جامع ارزیابی عملکرد و طراحی مسیر بلوغ CVCها است. در این راستا، با مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و تحلیل محتوای اسناد، ابعاد کلیدی عملکرد CVCها استخراج شده و پس‌از بررسی مدل‌های تعالی و بلوغ، مدل چندبعدی و پنج‌سطحی بلوغ CVCها با برگزاری نشست خبرگان طراحی و اعتبارسنجی شده است. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد عملکرد CVCها تابعی از توانمندسازهای سازمانی شامل راهبرد، حکمرانی، ساختار، منابع، فرایندهای سرمایه‌گذاری و توسعه بوم‌سازگان است که به شکل‌گیری نتایج مالی، نوآوری و راهبردی منجر می‌شود. دانش‌افزایی اصلی پژوهش، ارائه مدل ارزیابی چندبعدی و مبتنی بر بلوغ برای CVCها با تلفیق ابعاد مالی، نوآوری، راهبردی و سازمانی است که امکان طراحی مسیر بلوغ برای CVCها را فراهم می‌کند و همچنین می‌تواند مبنایی برای طراحی ابزارهای سیاستی ارائه دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Maturity Model for Corporate Venture Capital (CVC)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abolfazl Bagheri 1
  • Marzieh Shaverdi 2
  • Mehdi Elyasi 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Technology and Innovation Policy, National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP), Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of STI Financing and Economics, National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP), Tehran, Iran
3 Professor, Management and Accounting Faculty, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

In recent years, Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) has attracted the attention of large corporations and policymakers as an innovation financing arm. In Iran, with the approval of the “Guidelines and Statutes for the Establishment and Operation of CVC Research and Technology Funds” (2010) and the “Knowledge-Based Production Leap Law” (2022), the formation of these funds has experienced significant growth. However, the nature of this type of investment, which pursues both financial and strategic objectives simultaneously, presents conceptual and operational challenges for performance evaluation. The aim of this research, which was conducted using the Design Science Research Methodology (DSRM), is to develop a comprehensive performance evaluation model and design a maturity path for CVCs. In this regard, key dimensions of CVC performance were extracted through library research and document content analysis, and after reviewing excellence and maturity models, a multidimensional and five-level model of CVC maturity was designed and validated by holding an expert pabel. The research findings show that CVC performance is a function of organizational enablers including strategy, governance, structure, resources, investment processes, and ecosystem development which lead to the financial, innovation, and strategic outcomes. The main contribution of the research is the development of a multidimensional and maturity-based assessment model for CVCs by integrating financial, innovation, strategic, and organizational dimensions, This model enables the design of a maturity path for CVCs and can also serve as a basis for designing policy tools.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Corporate Venture Capital (CVC)
  • Performance Assessment
  • Maturity Model
  • Excellence Model
  • Innovation Ecosystem

مراجع

[1] NVCA. (2023). NVCA Yearbook 2023 (tech. report). [Internet]. Available at: nvca.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/NVCA-2023-Yearbook_FINALFINAL.pdf
[2] Global Corporate Venturing. (2025). The World Of Corporate Venturing 2025: The Definitive Guide To The Industry. Global Venturing. [Internet]. Available at: globalventuring.com/corporate/reports/
[3] Working Group of Research and Technology Funds. (2025). Legal - Historical Mapping Of Non-Governmental Research And Technology Funds. [Internet]. Available at: rtfunds.ir/ {In Persian}
[4] Islamic Parliament Research Center of Iran. (2025). Legal (Bills). [Internet]. Available at: rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/search {In Persian}
[5] Soltani, B., & Shaverdi, M. (2019). Science, Technology And Innovation Financing. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12(2), 297-314. doi: 20.1001.1.20080840.1398.12.2.20.5 {In Persian}
[6] Frey, P., & Kanbach, D. K. (2023). Design Dimensions Of Corporate Venture Capital Programs—A Systematic Literature Review. Management Review Quarterly, 1-36. doi: 10.1007/s11301-023-00372-2
[7] Keil, T., Maula, M., Schildt, H., & Zahra, S. A. (2008). The Effect Of Governance Modes And Relatedness Of External Business Development Activities On Innovative Performance. Strategic management journal, 29(8), 895-907. doi: 10.1002/smj.672
[8] Gutmann, T., Schmeiss, J., & Stubner, S. (2019). Unmasking Smart Capital: How Corporate Venture Capital Units Configure Value-Adding Services. Research-Technology Management, 62(4), 27-36. doi: 10.1080/08956308.2019.1613117
[9] Lasku, A., Arora, N., Sinha, A., & Shah, R. (2025). Unleashing The Power Of Corporate Venture Capital: Transforming Traditional Businesses Through External Innovation & Disruptive Strategies. Arthur D. Little. [Internet]. Available at: http://www.adlittle.com/sites/default/files/viewpoints/ADL_Power_of_corporate_venture_capital_2025.pdf
[10] Hill, S. A., Maula, M. V., Birkinshaw, J. M., & Murray, G. C. (2009). Transferability Of The Venture Capital Model To The Corporate Context: Implications For The Performance Of Corporate Venture Units. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(1), 3-27. doi: 10.1002/sej.54
[11] Haslanger, P., Lehmann, E. E., & Seitz, N. (2023). The Performance Effects Of Corporate Venture Capital: A Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(6), 2132-2160. doi: 10.1007/s10961-022-09954-w
[12] Young-seok, Y., & Young-sang. (2019). A Study On The Performance And Performance Factors Of Corporate Venture Capital. In Journal of Korean Innovation Society (Vol. 14, Issue 1).
[13] Bugl, B. M., Balz, F. P., & Kanbach, D. K. (2022). Leveraging Smart Capital Through Corporate Venture Capital: A Typology Of Value Creation For New Venture Firms. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 17, e00292. doi: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2021.e00292
[14] Kharazian, P. (2024). EFQM 2025 Excellence Model. [Internet]. Available at: kharazian.ir/knowledge/efqm-2025 {In Persian}
[15] NIST. (2025). Baldrige Award FAQs. [Internet]. Available at: http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/baldrige-award-faqs
[16] Dushnitsky, G. (2012). Corporate Venture Capital In The Twenty-First Century: An Integral Part Of Firms’ Innovation Toolkit. In: Cumming D (ed) The oxford handbook of venture capital. Oxford University Press. Oxford. 156–209.
[17] PwC Middle East. (2025). Corporate Venture Capital In The GCC: A CEO’s Guide To Leverage Corporate Venture Investments For Growth And Innovation (2025 Edition).
[18] Kang, J. K., Li, Y., & Oh, S. (2019). Geographic Concentration Of Venture Capital Investors, Corporate Monitoring, And Firm Performance. Corporate Monitoring, and Firm Performance (April, 8, 2019.
[19] DIC Corporation. (2024). Corporate Governance Report. [Internet]. Available at: http://www.dic-global.com/pdf/ir/management/governance/governance_en.pdf
[20] Bagheri, A., Rezaeian F., Booshehri, A. (2023). Corporate Venturing: Guidelines For Leaders In Industry, Academia, And Government. NRISP Publication {In Persian}
[21] Affinity. (2025). Limited Partners (LP) Vs. General Partners (GP) In Private Equity. [Internet]. Available at: http://www.affinity.co/blog/lp-gp-relationships
[22] Cuatrecasas. (2025). Corporate Venture Capital: Key Points. [Internet]. Available at: http://www.cuatrecasas.com/resources/corporate-venture-capital-key-points-681b339007d1d514629037.pdf?v1.93.0.20251024
[23] Shuwaikh, F., Brinette, S., & Khemiri, S. (2022). The Impact Of Dynamic Ambidexterity On The Performance Of Organizations: Evidence From Corporate Venture Capital Investing In North America. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 200, 991-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.07.012
[24] Maio, L., & Giudici, G. (2020). The Role Of Corporate Venture Capital And Corporate Accelerators In Developing Technology Ecosystems. The Case Of Amazon Alexa Fund. CINet 2020, 455-465. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3460230
[25] CB Insights. (2024). State Of Corporate Venture Capital 2024 (Report). [Internet]. Available at: http://www.cbinsights.com/research/report/corporate-venture-capital-trends-2024/
[26] Rasouli, M. (2024). The Transformation Of Artificial Intelligence In The Financial Industry: An Opportunity For Developing Economies. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 17(3), 67-75. doi: 10.22034/jstp.2025.11788.1822 {In Persian}
[27] KPMG. (2024). Venture Pulse Q4 2024. [Internet]. Available at: kpmg.com/us/en/articles/2024/venture-pulse-q4.html
[28] Weiblen, T., & Chesbrough, H. W. (2015). Engaging With Startups To Enhance Corporate Innovation. California management review, 57(2), 66-90. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2015.57.2.66
[29] Ilhan, E., Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020). Climate Risk Disclosure And Institutional Investors (Finance Working Paper No. 661/2020). European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI). [Internet]. Available at: ssrn.com/abstract=3437178
[30] GVC. (2025). Measure CVC Strategic Value. [Internet]. Available at:  globalventuring.com/corporate/overview/measure-cvc-strategic-value-tdk-shell-echo-health/
[31] NVCA. (2025). Nominations For NVCA Leadership Awards. [Internet]. Available at: nvca.org/nominations-for-nvcas-leadership-awards/
[32] Iran Quality management Association. (2025). Iran National Quality Award. [Internet]. Available at: iranqms.com/?page_id=102 {In Persian}
[33] IRAMOT. (2025). IRAMIT Model. [Internet]. Available at: iramot.ir/ {In Persian}
[34] IRVC. (2025). INTIFA Model. [Internet]. Available at: intifa.ir {In Persian}
[35] Bassen, A., Blasel, D., Faisst, U., & Hagenmuller, M. (2006). Performance Measurement Of Corporate Venture Capital–Balanced Scorecard In Theory And Practice. International Journal of Technology Management, 33(4), 420-437. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2006.009253
[36] Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A Design Science Research Methodology For Information Systems Research. Journal of management information systems, 24(3), 45-77. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
[37] Mittelmeijer, H. G., Felderhof, C. F., Keskin, D., & Dolmans, S. A. (2026). Investing In The Future: Evaluating Technology Ventures On Sustainability Impact In Venture Capital. Technovation, 153, 103536. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2026.103536
[38] Mettler, T. (2011). Maturity Assessment Models: A Design Science Research Approach. International Journal of Society Systems Science, 3(1-2), 81-98. doi: 10.1504/IJSSS.2011.038934
[39] Roshandel, J., Ghazinoory, S., & Fatemi, M. (2023). Development Of A Model For Choosing ICT-Based Businesses According To The Maturity Level Of Smart Cities. Journal of Executive Management, 15(29), 7-40. doi: 10.22080/jem.2023.22784.3680 {In Persian}
[40] Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2016). FEDS: A Framework For Evaluation In Design Science Research. European journal of information systems, 25(1), 77-89. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2014.36
 

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار