مطالعه موردی نقش میانجی‌گرانه کارگزاران استانداردسازی در بوم‌سازگان نوآوری ایران: تبیین یک خلأ نهادی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه سیاست فناوری و نوآوری، مؤسسه تحقیقات سیاست علمی کشور، تهران، ایران.

2 دانش‌آموخته دکتری مدیریت تکنولوژی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

3 استاد، مجتمع دانشگاهی مدیریت و مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر، تهران، ایران

10.22034/jstp.2025.12026.1919

چکیده

یکی از چالش‌های ساختاری کلیدی دربوم‌سازگان نوآوری ایران، فقدان نهادهای میانجی مؤثر برای همراهی و پشتیبانی عملیاتی از شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان درمسیر انطباق با استانداردهاست. این مقاله، با بهره‌گیری از روش مطالعه ‌موردی منفرد تعبیه‌شده، به بررسی یک‌شرکت تخصصیِ استانداردسازی می‌پردازد که طی سال‌های ۱۳۹۸-۱۴۰۲، به‌عنوان کارگزار معاونت علمی‌و‌فناوری ریاست‌جمهوری فعالیت داشته ‌است. داده‌ها ازطریق مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته، مشاهده مشارکتی و تحلیل اسناد گردآوری شده و با روش ردیابی فرایند و تحلیل‌مضمون بررسی شده‌اند. یافته‌ها حاکی که این نهاد با ایفای هشت ‌‌نقش میانجی‌گرانه شامل شناختی، دانشی، فنی، تصدیق‌وصحه‌گذاری، نهادی، شبکه‌ساز، یادگیری و بازارساز درمسیر نوآوری و ورود به بازار شرکت‌ها نقش‌آفرینی کرده‌ است. این نقش‌ها نه از پیش طراحی‌شده، بلکه پاسخی تدریجی و اقتضایی به خلأها و کاستی‌های بوم‌سازگان نوآوری ایران بوده‌اند. یافته‌ها نشان داد که شدت مداخلات کارگزار تحت‌تأثیر عواملی نظیر درجه پیچیدگی و مرحله توسعه محصول، حساسیت الزامات ایمنی و مقررات ‌فنی، میزان پیشرفته‌بودن فناوری و نیاز‌های سازمانی شرکت‌ها بوده‌است. پژوهش حاضر با مفهوم‌پردازیِ گونه‌ای از نهادهای میانجی درتنظیم‌گری و استانداردسازی، نه‌تنها به توسعه نظری واسطه‌های نوآوری کمک‌کرده و خلأ نهادی موجود را دراین زمینه نمایان می‌سازد، بلکه بر ضرورت طراحی سیاست‌هایی برای حمایت از این‌گونه نهادها، یکپارچگی سیاست‌های نوآوری و استانداردسازی، بازنگری در مدل‌های تنظیم‌گری و ایجاد ترتیبات نهادی پایدار به‌منظور بهره‌برداری مؤثر از این ‌الگو دربوم‌سازگان نوآوری ایران تأکید دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Case Study on the Intermediary Role of Standardization Agents in Iran’s Innovation Ecosystem: Explaining an Institutional Void

نویسندگان [English]

  • maryam rozesara 1
  • Mojtaba Bahiraee 2
  • Manouchehr Manteghi 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Technology and Innovation Policy, National Research Institute for Science Policy, Tehran, Iran.
2 Ph.D. of Technology Management, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 Professor, Faculty of Management and Industrial Engineering, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

A key structural challenge in Iran's innovation ecosystem is the lack of effective intermediary institutions to operationally support and accompany knowledge-based companies in compliance with standards. Employing an embedded single-case study methodology, this paper examines a specialized standardization firm that acted as an agent of the Vice-Presidency for Science and Technology between 2019 and 2023. The study aims to identify and analyze the intermediary roles played by this company in the standardization and commercialization processes of three technology-based firms. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis, and were examined using process tracing and thematic analysis. The findings indicate that this institution played a significant role in the innovation and market-entry pathways of the companies by performing eight intermediary functions: cognitive, knowledge, technical, verification and validation, institutional, network-building, learning, and market-making. These roles were not pre-designed but emerged as gradual and context-driven responses to institutional voids and systemic deficiencies within Iran’s innovation ecosystem. Furthermore, the intensity of the agent’s interventions was influenced by factors such as the degree of product complexity, stage of product development, the stringency of safety requirements and technical regulations, level of technology sophistication, and the specific organizational needs of the firms. By conceptualizing a novel type of intermediary institution engaged in regulatory and standardization activities, this study not only contributes to the literature on innovation intermediaries and reveals existing institutional voids, but also emphasizes the necessity of policy measures to support such institutions, integrate innovation and standardization policies, revise regulatory models, and establish sustainable institutional arrangements to effectively leverage this model within Iran’s innovation ecosystem.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Intermediaries
  • Standardization Agent
  • Innovation Ecosystem
  • Institutional Void
  • Case Study

مراجع

[1] Kanani, F., Rasoulian, P., Hafezi, R., & Ahangari, S. S. (2023). Analysis of the Artificial Intelligence Ecosystem in Iran and Identifying Institutional and Functional Gaps. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 16(2), 59-77.{In Persian} https://doi.org/10.22034/jstp.2023.11303.1648
[2] Watkins, A., Papaioannou, T., Mugwagwa, J., & Kale, D. (2015). National Innovation Systems and the Intermediary Role of Industry Associations in Building Institutional Capacities for Innovation in Developing Countries: A Critical Review of the Literature. Research policy, 44(8), 1407-1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.004
[3] Hesabi, F., & Khordmandnia, S. (2022). On the Path Toward Knowledge-Based and Job-Creating Production: An Institutional Pathology of the Science and Technology Commercialization System in Iran (Report No. 18178). Energy, Industry and Mining Studies Office, Iranian Parliament Research Center. {In Persian} https://rc.majlis.ir/en/report/show/1743202
[4] Nylund, P. A., & Brem, A. (2023). Standardization in Innovation Ecosystems: The Promise and Peril of Dominant Platforms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122714
[5] Blind, K. (2016). The Impact of Standardisation and Standards on Innovation. Handbook of innovation policy impact, 423. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781784711856.00021
[6] Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the Role of Intermediaries in Innovation. Research policy, 35(5), 715-728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
[7] Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Establishment and Embedding of Innovation Brokers at Different Innovation System Levels: Insights From the Dutch Agricultural Sector. Technological forecasting and social change, 76(6), 849-860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001
[8] Zhang, C., & Liu, N. (2024). Innovation Intermediaries: A Review, Bibliometric Analysis, and Research Agenda. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 49(3), 1113-1143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10030-0
[9] De Silva, M., Howells, J., & Meyer, M. (2018). Innovation Intermediaries and Collaboration: Knowledge–Based Practices and Internal Value Creation. Research Policy, 47(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.011
[10] van Rijnsoever, F. J. (2022). Intermediaries for the Greater Good: How Entrepreneurial Support Organizations Can Embed Constrained Sustainable Development Startups in Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Research Policy, 51(2), 104438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104438
[11] Gassmann, O., Daiber, M., & Enkel, E. (2011). The Role of Intermediaries in Cross‐Industry Innovation Processes. R&d Management, 41(5), 457-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00651.x
[12] Aspeteg, J., & Bergek, A. (2020). The Value Creation of Diffusion Intermediaries: Brokering Mechanisms and Trade-offs in Solar and Wind Power in Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119640
[13] Swann, G. (2010). International Standards and Trade: A Review of the Empirical Literature. OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 97, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmdbg9xktwg-en.
[14] Blind, K. (2017). The Economic Functions of Standards in the Innovation Process. Handbook of innovation and standards, 38-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781783470082.00010
[15] Tassey, G. (2000). Standardization in Technology-Based Markets. Research policy, 29(4-5), 587-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00091-8
[16] Wiegmann, P. M., de Vries, H. J., & Blind, K. (2017). Multi-Mode Standardisation: A Critical Review and A Research Agenda. Research Policy, 46(8), 1370-1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.002
[17] Blind, K., & Gauch, S. (2009). Research and Standardisation in Nanotechnology: Evidence From Germany. The journal of technology transfer, 34(3), 320-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-008-9089-8
[18] Tassey, G. (2017). Standards and Expansion Paths in High-Tech Industries. In Handbook of innovation and standards (pp. 135-161). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783470082.00015
[19] Foucart, R., & Li, Q. C. (2021). The Role of Technology Standards in Product Innovation: Theory and Evidence From UK Manufacturing Firms. Research Policy, 50(2), 104157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104157
[20] Lorenz, A., Raven, M., & Blind, K. (2019). The Role of Standardization at the Interface of Product and Process Development in Biotechnology. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(4), 1097-1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9644-2
[21] Wu, Y., & de Vries, H. J. (2022). Effects of Participation in Standardization on Firm Performance From A Network Perspective: Evidence From China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121376
[22] Blind, K., & Mangelsdorf, A. (2016). Motives to Standardize: Empirical Evidence From Germany. Technovation, 48, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.01.001
[23] Zhou, X., Shan, M., & Li, J. (2018). R&D Strategy and Innovation Performance: The Role of Standardization. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(7), 778-792. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1378319
[24] De Vries, H., Blind, K., Mangelsdorf, A., Verheul, H., & van der Zwan, J. (2009). SME Access to European Standardization. Enabling Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises to Achieve Greater Benefit From Standards and From Involvement in Standardization, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, August, 1. http://www.cenelec.eu/NR/rdonlyres/88D06BD5-CA51-479D-A416-AB1F3BE67E66/0/SMEAccessReport20090821.pdf
[25] Rozesara, M., & Bahiraee, M, (2023). The Standardization Policy Framework to Support the Economy of Knowledge-Based Companies [Research report]. National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP).{In Persian}
[26] Rozesara, M., Farahmand Dehghanpour, M., & Bahiraee, M, (2017). Iranian Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) Access to Standards: Policy Recommendations for Enabling SMEs to Achieve Benefit From Standards and Standardization. International Conference on Management of Technology and Innovation (IRAMOT2017). https://civilica.com/doc/750085/
[27] Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of management, 43(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
[28] Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards A Theory of Ecosystems. Strategic management journal, 39(8), 2255-2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
[29] Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation Ecosystems: A Conceptual Review and A New Definition. Technovation, 90, 102098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098
[30] Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard business review, 71(3), 75-86. PMID: 10126156
[31] Doloreux, D., & Turkina, E. (2023). Intermediaries in Regional Innovation Systems: An Historical Event-Based Analysis Applied to AI Industry in Montreal. Technology in Society, 72, 102192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102192
[32] Bigdelou, N., Zare, H., & Ghazinoory, S. (2021). The Application of Innovation Ecotone Theory to Modify the Structure of Iran's Innovation Ecosystem. Journal of industry & university, 13, 49-50.{In Persion} Doi: 20.1001.1.27170446.1399.13.49.5.1
[33] Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. (2010). Winning in Emerging Markets: A Road Map for Strategy and Execution. Harvard Business Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0974173920100316
[34] Mair, J., Marti, I., & Ventresca, M. J. (2012). Building Inclusive Markets in Rural Bangladesh: How Intermediaries Work Institutional Voids. Academy of Management journal, 55(4), 819-850. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0627
[35] Khaledi, A., Asadifard, R., & Mirzaei Douraki, R. (2024). The Functions of Innovation Intermediaries in the Process of Inter-firm Technological Collaborations. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 17(2), 17-31.{In Persion} doi: 10.22034/jstp.2024.11678.1791
[36] Taslimi, M., Naghavi, M. H., Mokhtarzadeh, N., & Babaei, A. (2018). The Role of Intermediary Institutions in the Emergence of Biopharma Industry in Iran. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 11(3), 29-44.{In Persion} doi: 10.22034/jstp.2018.10.3.539498
[37] Danaeifard, H. (2015). Desired Functions of Innovation Intermediaries for Enhancing Innovational Capacity in Knowledge-Based Firms. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 8(3), 1-22. {In Persion} https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20080840.1394.8.3.2.1
[38] Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications (Vol. 6). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[39] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[40] Collier, D. (2011). Understanding Process Tracing. PS: political science & politics, 44(4), 823-830. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429
[41] Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry Vol. 75 .Sage Beverly Hills, CA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
 
 

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار