دلالت‌های سیاستگذارانه حکمرانی خوب در سند تحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

دلالت‌های سیاستگذارانه هر نظامی در آیینه اسناد بالادستی آن به عرصه ظهور می‌رسد. اسناد بالادستی مبین اصول، ارزش‌ها، اهداف و آرمان‌های هر نظامی است. با توجه به اینکه یکی از رهیافت‌های مورد توجه در اداره سازمان‌های آموزشی، حکمرانی‌خوب است، پژوهش حاضر به منظور شناسایی دلالت‌های سیاستگذارارنه حکمرانی‌خوب در اسناد بالادستی آموزش‌و‌پرورش انجام شده است. در این پژوهش به صورت موردی سند تحول بنیادین آموزش‌و‌پروش مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته است. روش پژوهش، کیفی از نوع دلالت‌پژوهی به شیوه نظام‌مند می‌باشد. در بخش شاخص‌های حکمرانی‌خوب، ۲3 شاخص از ادغام شاخص‌های هفت منبع علمی احصا شد. سپس دلالت‌های موجود در سند تحول بنیادین آموزش‌و‌پرورش برای شاخص‌های احصا شده مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. مجموعه دلالت‌های استخراجی پژوهش نشان داد که در سند تحول بنیادین آموزش‌و‌پرورش دلالت‌های قابل توجهی از حکمرانی‌خوب می‌توان یافت که نشان‌دهنده اهمیت موضوع نزد تدوین‌کنندگان سند می‌باشد. البته دلالت‌های احصا شده نشان داد که بر برخی شاخص‌ها از جمله اخلاق‌مداری تاکید بیشتر و بر برخی دیگر مانند اجماع‌محوری تاکید کمتری شده است. اکثر دلالت‌های احصا شده به صورت گزاره‌های کلی و غیر شفاف تدوین شده‌اند. با توجه به دلالت‌های تمرکززدایی و کیفیت تنظیم‌گری می‌توان گفت همچنان بازیگر کلیدی در اداره نظام تعلیم و تربیت، نظام حاکم می‌باشد و اعطای استقلال لازم به دو بازیگر دیگر حکمرانی‌خوب (جامعه مدنی و بخش خصوصی) در دستور کار جدی تدوین‌گران سند نبوده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Policy-making Implications of Good Governance in Education Documents (Case: Fundamental transformation document)

نویسندگان [English]

  • javad pourkarimi 1
  • Mahnaz Hasanbandi 2
  • Maryam Samadi 2
1 Associate Profesor, Department of Management and Educational Planning, University of Tehran,Tehran, Iran
2 PhD candidate of Educational Management, University of Tehran,Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The strategic implications of any system are reflected in the mirror of its upstream documents. These upstream documents signify the principles, values, goals, and ideals of each system. Given that good governance is a prominent approach in managing educational organizations, the present study aims to identify the strategic implications of good governance in the upstream documents of education. In this research, the fundamental transformation document of education has been studied as a case. The research method is applied, which was done qualitative, specifically a systematic approach to implication-research. In the section on indicators of good governance, 23 indicators were derived from the integration of indicators from seven different sources. Subsequently, the implications present in the fundamental transformation document of education were examined for the derived indicators. The extracted set of implications revealed that the document emphasizes significant implications of good governance, indicating its importance to the document’s authors. However, some indicators, such as ethics, received greater emphasis, while others, like consensus-oriented governance, received less attention. Most of the extracted implications are formulated as general and non-transparent statements. Considering the implications related to decentralization and quality regulation, it can be argued that the educational system remains a key player, and the necessary independence has not been granted to the other two key actors of good governance (civil society and the private sector) in the serious agenda of document authors

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Good Governance
  • Documents
  • Document of The Fundamental Transformation of Education
  • Implication-Research Studies

مراجع

[1] UNESCO. (2023). The Right to Education. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/right-education
[2] Behrens, C. (2014). Educational Governance Today. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan. 5 (2), 176- 189.
DOI: 10.18196/jgp.2014.0017
[3] European Network of Education Councils. (2016). Governance in education. https://eunec.eu/sites/www.eunec.eu/files/event/attachments/report_amsterdam.pdf
[4] Kadir, J.N. A. (2019). Good Governance Issues in Education System and Management of Secondary Schools in Kwara State, Nigeria. EJEP: EJournal of Education Policy, 1-14.
https://in.nau.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/135/2019/11/Kadir.pdf
[5] Walters, W. (2002). Social Capital and Political Sociology: Re-Imagining Politics? Sociology, 36(2), 377-397.
DOI: 10.1177/0038038502036002008
[6] Eberle, S. (2003). Social Capital and Good Governance: The Impact of Civil Society on Government Performance. University of Konstanz, Faculty of Law, Economics, and Politics, Department of Politics and Management.https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/4209
[7] Wilkins, A. & Olmedo, A. (2018). Education Governance and Social Theory: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Research. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
[8] Hasanbandi, M., Farhadi Rad, H., & Rahimidoost, G. H. (2022). The Identifying and Structural Analyzing Good Governance Drivers in Iran’s Education System Using Cross-Impact Analysis Approach. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 13(2), 107-87. DOI:10.30495/JEDU.2022.27834.5577{In Persian}
[9] Rajabi, A. R., Shamoradi, S. N., & Hasan Moradi, N. (2021). Higher Education Governance in Iran; Meta-analysis of Injuries and Solutions. Applied Educational Leadership, 1(4), 27-46. https://ael.uma.ac.ir/article_1156.html?lang=en{In Persian}
[10] Nasir Natery, J., KHalkhali, A., SHakibaei, Z., Soleimanpour, J., & Kazempour, E. (2020). Explaining The Structures of Good Governance in The Iranian Public Education System. Journal of Teaching in Marine Sciences, 7(2), 109-124. https://sid.ir/paper/954290/en. {In Persian}.
[11] Ghaffarian Muslimi, A., & Kazemi, S. (2012). An Overview of Evaluation Indicators and Monitoring of the Realization of the Development Vision Document of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Horizon of 1404 A.H. Reformation and Education, 11(132), 20-25. https://B2n.ir/x93343.{In Persian}.
[12] hadavand, M. (2005). Good Governance, Development and Human Rights. Basic Rights, 2(4), 51-86. https://www.asasimag.ir/article_105513.html?lang=fa. {In Persian}.
[13] UNDP, U. (1997). Governance for Sustainable Human Development, A UNDP Policy Document, United Nations Development Programme. UNDP. https://www.undp-aciac.org/publications/other/undp/governance/undppolicydoc97-e.pdf.
[14] Basirpour, P., Nadi, M. A., & Karimi, F. (2023). Network based Model of Education Governance with an Islamic Approach Based on Nahj al Balaghah.  Islamic Perspective on Educational Science, 10 (19), 269-302.
DOI: 10.30497/ESI.2022.76503. {In Persian}.
[15] Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido-Lobatón, P. (2002). Governance Matters II: Updated Indicators for 2000-01. World Bank Publications. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/613411468765868451/Governance-matters-II-updated-indicators-for-2000-01.
[16] Soltani Nejad, A., & Goodarzi, S. (2017). The Impact of Information Technology on the Evolution of the Concept of Good Governance. Political Quarterly, 47(1), 79-97. DOI: 10.22059/JPQ.2017.60775{In Persian}.
[17] Shikha, V. Y. A. S., & Aktan, C. C. (2017). Progression from Ideal State to Good Governance: An Introductory Overview. International journal of business and management studies, 9(1), 29-49.  https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/440184
[18] Hallak, J. (2006). Governance in Education: Transparency and Accountability. M. Poisson (Ed.). UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000148766
[19] Dabbagh, S., & Nafari, N. (2009). Explanation of Goodness Concept in Good Governance. Journal of Public Administration, 1(3), 3-18. DOI: 20.1001.1.20085877.1388.1.3.1.0 {In Persian}.
[20] United Nation Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2009). What is Good Governance? UNESCAP, Bangkok, Thailand. http://www.unescap.org/pdd.
[21] Wilkins, A., & Olmedo, A. (2020). Education Governance and Social Theory: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Research. Bloomsbury Publishing.
[22] OECD (2019). Education Governance: Policy Priorities and Trends, 2008-19.OECD. DOI: 10.1787/4581cb4d-en
[23] Navid Adham, M., & Ragheb, F. (2019). Designing a Model for the Implementation of the Document of Fundamental Transformation of Education. Culture in Islamic University, (1) 10, 67-84. http://ciu.nahad.ir/article_832.html. {In Persian}.
[24] Soares Furtado Oliveira, A., Nunes, A., & Guerra, M. (2023). Analyzing the literature on Education Governance Over the Last 71 years. Revista de Gestão, 30(1), 2-17. DOI: 10.1108/REGE-03-2020-0016
[25] Supriadi, D., Usman, H., & JABAR, C. (2021). Good School Governance: An Approach to Principal’s Decision-Making Quality in Indonesian Vocational School. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 6(4), 796-831. DOI: 10.30828/real/2021.4.2.
[26] Khanna, P. (2016). A Conceptual Framework for Achieving Good Governance at Open and Distance Learning Institutions. Open      Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 32(1), 21-35. DOI:10.1080/02680513.2016.1246246
[27] Ayubipour, M., Ghasemi, H., Aivazi, M. R., Keshavarz Turk, E., & Darvishi Se Telani, F. (2022). Depicting the Optimal Governance in the Islamic Republic of Iran Based on Upstream Documents. Scientific Journal of Islamic Management, 30(2), 131-171. DOI: 20.1001.1.22516980.1401.30.2.4.5  {In Persian}.
[28] Heidari, A. R. (2022). Strategic Analysis of the Competencies of Iran's Educational System Based on the Conceptual Framework of Policy-Making Capacity. Strategy, 31(1), 39-77. DOI: 10.22034/rahbord.2022.149768 {In Persian}.
[29] Hashemi, M., Mortazavi, M., & Rahmani, H. (2021). Designing a Model of Public Education in Iran, a Governance Approach. Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies, 4(4), 99-130. DOI: 10.22034/JIPAS.2022.312332.1270 {In Persian}.
[30] Khalkhali, A., NasirNateri, J., Shakibaei, Z., Solimanpoor, J., & Kazempour, S. (2020). Conceptualization of Good Governance in Iran's Public Education System by Phenomenological Approach. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 11(41), 191-208.  DOI: 20.1001.1.20086369.1399.11.41.9.8 {In Persian}.
[31] Danai Fard, H. (2016). Methodology of Signification Studies in Social and Human Sciences: Foundations, Definitions, Importance, Approaches and Implementation Steps. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 22(86), 39-71. https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_1148.html?lang=fa {In Persian}.
[32] Kaufmann, D. & Kraay, A. (2023). Worldwide Governance Indicators. Worldbank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators.
[33] OECD. (2015). Policy Framework for Investment User’s Toolkit. Chapter 10. Public Governance. OECD.
https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2015/09/policy-framework-for-investment-2015-edition_g1g3e67f/9789264208667-en.pdf
[34] Asian Development Bank. (1995). Governance: Sound Development Management. ADB. https://www.adb.org/documents/governance-sound-development-management
[35] Western Hemisphere Department International Monetary Fund. (1997). Good Governance: the IMF's Role. Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/exrp/govern/govindex.htm
[36] Samadi, M. (2022). Identifying the Neglected Capacities in the Fundamental Change in Education Policy Document by Meta-synthesis Method. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 12(43), 80-107. DOI:  10.22034/SSPP.2022.545310.3102 {In Persian}.
[37] Koohiagdam, E., & Koohiagdam, E. (2023). Examining the Content of the Social Studies Textbook of the Second Elementary School Based on the Indicators of National Identity, Ethics, Manners and Life Skills in the Document of the Fundamental Transformation of Education.  Journal of Research in Social Studies Education, 5(1), 23-40. DOI:  20.1001.1.27832279.1402.5.1.2.5 {In Persian}.
 [38] Yadollahi, A., Zarei, M. H., & Yavari, A. (2020). A Comparative Study of the 2030 Agenda Approach and the Transformation Document in Iran’s Education toward Gender Educational Equality. Public Law Research, 21(65), 171-198. DOI: 10.22054/qjpl.2019.34379.1910 {In Persian}.
[39] Hasani, R., & Esmayeli, R. (2022). The Components of Global Citizenship Education in Documenting the Fundamental Transformation of Education and the Application in the Formal Education System. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(63), 199-228. DOI: 20.1001.1.17354986.1400.16.63.10.7 {In Persian}.
[40] Khavari, A., Rafati, M., Saheb Ehktiyari, B. & Agha Mohammadi, M. (2015). Transformation in School Management: School-Centered Management, Examining the Principles of School-Centered Management in the Fundamental Transformation of Education Document. The first scientific research conference of educational sciences and psychology of social and cultural harms in Iran, Tehran. https://www.en.symposia.ir/PSCONF01 {In Persian}.
 

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار