[1] Hansson, F. (2006). Organizational use of evaluations governance and control in research evaluation. Evaluation, 12(2), 159-178.
[2] Frederiksen, L. F., Hansson, F., & Wenneberg, S. B. (2003). The Agora and the role of research evaluation. Evaluation, 9(2), 149-172.
[3] Ghazinoory, S., Farazkish, M., Montazer, G. A., & Soltani, B. (2017). Designing a national science and technology evaluation system based on a new typology of international practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 119-127.
[4] Godin, B. (2004). Measurement and Statistics on Science and Technology: 1920 to the Present. Routledge.
[5] UNESCO. (2010). UNESCO Science Report: The Current Status of Science around the World. Paris.
[6] Aitsi-Selmi, A., Murray, V., Wannous, C., Dickinson, C., Johnston, D., Kawasaki, A., ... & Yeung, T. (2016). Reflections on a science and technology agenda for 21st century disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 7(1), 1-29.
[7] Molas-Gallart, J. (2012). Research governance and the role of evaluation: A comparative study. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(4), 583-598.
[8] Barker, K. (2007). The UK Research Assessment Exercise: The evolution of a national research evaluation system. Research Evaluation, 16(1), 3-12.
[9] Chelimsky, E. (2006). The purposes of evaluation in a democratic society. The SAGE Handbook of Evaluation, 33-55.
[10] Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2007). Research evaluation in transition. In The Changing Governance of the Sciences (pp. 205-223). Springer Netherlands.
[11] Coryn, C. L., Hattie, J. A., Scriven, M., & Hartmann, D. J. (2007). Models and mechanisms for evaluating government-funded research: An international comparison. American Journal of Evaluation, 28(4), 437-457.
[12] Bazargan Harandi, A. (2004). Validation in Higher Education. Encyclopedia of Higher Education, 1(1), 163-166. {In Persian}.
[13] Hansson, F. (2003). How to evaluate and select new scientific knowledge?. Vest. a Journal for Science and Technology Studies.
[14] Hansen, H. F. (2009). Research Evaluation: Methods, Practice, and Experience. Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation.
[15] Hansen, H. F. (2005). Choosing evaluation models A discussion on evaluation design. Evaluation, 11(4), 447-462.
[16] Rossi, P. H., Lipsey M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
[17] Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[18] Jørgensen, T. B. (2003). ‘Værdier i harmoni, konflikt og forandring’. In Jørgensen, T. B. (ed.), På sporet af en offentlig identitet, pp. 63-80. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
[19] Stame, N. (2004). Theory-Based Evaluation and Varieties of Complexity. Evaluation, 10(1), 58-76.
[20] Karimi, T. (2005). New Models of Organizational Performance Evaluation. Tadbir, 17(171), 22-27. {In Persian}.
[21] Amiran, H. (2003). Performance Evaluation: Dos and Don'ts. Tadbir, 14(136), 77-80. {In Persian}.
[22] Brown, M. G., & Svenson, R. A. (1998). RTM Classic: Measuring R&D Productivity. Research-Technology Management, 41(6), 30-35.
[23] European Commission. (2014). Indicators for monitoring and evaluation: a practical guide.
[24] Ghazinoory, S., & Farazkish, M. (2018). A modal for STI national evaluation based efficiency, effectiveness and Utility index. Strategic Studies of public policy, 8(27), 205-229. {In Persian}.
[25] Farazkish, M. (2017). Designing an evaluation model of science, technology and innovation process for Iranian government organizations. Ph.D. thesis in science and technology policy, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modarres University. {In Persian}.
[26] Nowruzi Chakly, A., Ghazavi, R., & Taheri, B. (2015). Valuation of research indicators for different fields of science in Iran. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 7(4), 31-40. {In Persian}.
[27] The World Bank. (2004). World Development Indicators. Retrieved May 2012, from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator.
[28] Ghazinoory, S., & Farazkish, M. (2017). Innovation process evaluation of national organizations with an integrated approach. Collections of papers and negotiations. Tehran: Academy of sciences. pp. 128-137. {In Persian}.
[29] Ghanei Rad, M. A., Mahmoudi, M., & Ebrahim Abadi, H. (2018). A multi-dimensional model of humanities development evaluation. Collections of papers and negotiations. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 9(1), 85-103. {In Persian}.
[30] Chien, C. F., Chen, C. P., & Chen, C. H. (2009). Designing performance indices and a novel mechanism for evaluating government R&D projects. Journal of Quality, 16(2), 119.
[31] Fahrenkrog, G., Polt, W., Rojo, J., Tübke, A., & Zinöcker, K. (2002). RTD Evaluation Tool Box: Assessing the Socio-economic Impact of RTD Policies. IPTS Technical Report Series. Seville.
[32] Street, D. (2009). Developing key performance indicators for humanities. Royal Irish Academy.
[33] Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. (2013). Quality Indicators in the Social Sciences.
[34] European Commission. (2003). Third report on scientific and technological indicators 2003. Office for official publications of the European communities.
[35] Wieringa, R., Maiden, N., Mead, N., & Rolland, C. (2006). Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion. Requirements Engineering, 11(1), 102-107.
[36] CCA (Council of Canadian Academies). (2012). Informing Research Choices: Indicators and Judgment (The Expert Panel on Science Performance and Research Funding).
[37] CCA (Council of Canadian Academies). (2012). The State of Science and Technology in Canada 2012 (The Expert Panel on the State of Science and Technology in Canada).
[38] Ochester, M. (2012). Indicators for Research Quality for Evaluation of Humanities Research: Opportunities and Limitations. BAND (1).
[39] Marjanovic, S., Hanney, S., & Wooding, S. (2009). A Historical Reflection on Research Evaluation Studies, Their Recurrent Themes and Challenges. Technical Report. RAND Corporation.
[40] NHMRC. (2013). National Health and Medical Research Council Submission to the Productivity Commission’s Research Study on Public Support for Science and Innovation in Australia.
)
