تحلیل پدیدارشناسانه عوامل درون‌سازمانی مؤثر بر استفاده از مؤسسات تولید مقاله و پایان‌نامه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری برنامه‌ریزی توسعه آموزش عالی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج

2 عضو هیأت‌علمی دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران

10.22034/jstp.2019.10.4.539573

چکیده

شکل‌گیری و گسترش فعالیت مؤسسات موسوم به تولید مقاله و پایان‌نامه، نظام آموزش عالی ایران را با چالش‌های مخاطره‌انگیزی مواجه ساخته‌ که در سطوح فردی، سازمانی و اجتماعی، تبعاتی را به همراه داشته است. مطالعه حاضر با هدف واکاوی عوامل درون‌سازمانی مؤثر بر گرایش به استفاده از این مؤسسات انجام شده است. پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی و به روش پدیدارشناسی انجام و نمونه‌گیری به صورت هدفمند و ملاکی انجام گرفته است. حجم نمونه، وابسته به اشباع نظری داده‌ها بوده که بر این اساس تجربه زیسته 22 نفر از صاحب‌نظران در قلمرو موضوعی مدنظر مورد بررسی عمیق قرار گرفت. داده‌ها با استفاده از فن مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختمند گردآوری و مبتنی بر راهبرد کلایزی تحلیل شده‌اند. تحلیل داده‌ها به شناسایی و دسته‌بندی پنج دسته از عوامل درون‌سازمانی مؤثر بر گرایش به استفاده از مؤسسات تولید مقاله و پایان‌نامه شامل عوامل مدیریتی، فرهنگی، نظارتی، آموزشی و فردی منتج شد. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که رونق یافتن مؤسسات مقاله‌نویسی می‌تواند نشاط و پویایی مراکز علمی و دانشگاهی را از درون با چالش‌هایی جدی همراه و آنها را در تحقق رسالت‌شان در ارزش‌آفرینی و زمینه‌سازی رفاه و توسعه پایدار و متوازن جامعه، با مشکلات دوچندان مواجه نماید.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Phenomenological Analysis of Effective Intra-Organizational Factors in Use the Articles and Thesis Production Institutions

نویسندگان [English]

  • Majid Ghasemi 1
  • Keyvan Salehi 2
1 Ph.D Student, Higher Education Development Planing, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The formation and expansion of the activities of the well-known institutes to the production of articles and thesis have put Iran's higher education system at faced with questions and serious challenges that has been consequences at individual, organizational and social levels. The Present study aimed to analyze intra-organizational factors in the tendency to use the articles and thesis production institutions. The study was conducted using a qualitative method and phenomenological approach. Sampling was done purposefully and with using criterion sampling. The sample size to the theoretical saturation of data was dependent that based on this, the lived experience of 22 experts in the realm of the subject was deeply investigated. The data are collected via semi-structured interviews, and was analyzed using Colaizzi strategy. Data analysis has led to the identification and categorization of five categories of effective intera-organization factors in the tendency to use the articles and thesis production institutions, including management, cultural, regulatory, educational and individual factors. The results show that developing essay writing institutions, can accompany the vitality and dynamism of scientific and academic centers with serious challenges from their inside and could be faced them with double problems in fulfilling their mission for the creating value and welfare and preparing sustainable development of society.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Articles and Thesis Production Institutions
  • Plagiarism
  • Intra-Organizational
  • University

مراجع

[1] Tabei, Z., & Mahmoudian, F. (2007). Ethics in research. Ethics in Sciences and Technology, 2(1 & 2), 49-56. {In Persian}.
[2] Fatima, A., Abbas, A., Ming, W., Hosseini, S., & Zhu, D. (2019). Internal and external factors of plagiarism: Evidence from Chinese public sector universities. Accountability in research, 26(1), 1-16.
[3] Macfarlane, B., & Saitoh, Y. (2008). Research ethics in Japanese higher education: Faculty attitudes and cultural mediation. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(3), 181-195.
[4] Khodaie, E., Moghadamzadeh, A., & Salehi, K. (2011). Factors Affecting the Probability of Academic Cheating School Students in Tehran. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29(1), 1587-1595.
[5] Jamali, R. (2011). The necessity of establishing a national center for education and prevention of plagiarism as a prerequisite for policy making of science and technology in the country. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 3(3), 111-112. {In Persian}.
[6] Zamani, B. E., Azimi, S. A., & Soleymani, N. (2013). Identifying and prioritizing the effective factors affecting the students’ plagiarism in Isfahan University. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 19(1), 91-110. {In Persian}.
[7] Curtis, G. J., & Vardanega, L. (2016). Is plagiarism changing over time? A 10-year time-lag study with three points of measurement. Higher EducationResearch & Development, 35, 1167-1179.
[8] Tavakkol, M., & Naserirad, M. (2009). Scientific plagiarism with an explanation of the sociology of science. The Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 4(3&4), 1-16. {In Persian}.
[9] Salehi, K., Zeinabadi, H. R., & Parand, K. (2009). Implementing of the systemic approach for Quality evaluation of Technical-Vocational schools (TVS): A case of evaluating girl’s TVS in Tehran. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations, 8(29), 152-206. {In Persian}.
[10] Nakhaee, N., Najafipour, H., Rohani, A., Raftari, Sh., Mobasher, M., & Hasani, F. (2009). Proposing Disciplinary Charter of Research Misconduct: a Qualitative Study. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 7(1), 1-8. {In Persian}.
[11] Zaker-Salehi, G. (2010). Plagiarism: Social and Legal Aspects. Tehran: Research Institute of Cultural and Social Studies. {In Persian}.
[12] Wester, K. L., Willse, J. T., & Davis, M. S. (2008). Responsible conduct of research measure: Initial development and pilotstudy. Journal of Clinical Research Best Practice, 4(8), 1-12.
[13] Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of surveydata. PLoS Medicine, 4(5), 1-11.
[14] Faramarz-Gharmaleki, A. (2015). Plagiarism: Organizational Approach. Quarterly Review Book, 1(2), 5-19. {In Persian}.
[15] Jamshidi, B. G., Saeedi, M., & Haidari, Gh. (2014). A survey on knowledge of post- graduate students of Shaheed Chamran University of Ahwaz of plagiarism and its influencing factors. Journal of Information Systems and Services, 3(11 & 12), 95-108. {In Persian}.
[16] Debnath, J. (2016). Plagiarism: A silent epidemic in scientific writing - Reasons, recognition and remedies. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 72(2), 164-167.
[17] Imani, E., & Abed, S. J. (2015). Review the types of scientific misconduct in nursing research and strategies to deal with it. Iranian Journal of Nursing Research, 10(1), 76-85. {In Persian}.
[18] Sarlauskiene, L., & Stabingis, L. (2014). Understanding of Plagiarism by the Students in HEIs of Lithuania. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 638-636.
[19] Fogg, P. (2006). Young Ph.D. Say Collegiality Matters More than Salary. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(6), 1-4.
[20] Fazlollahi, S., & Maleki tavana, M. (2011). Solutions to Output from Cultural Barriers of Science Production at Universities. Journal of Marifat, 20(171), 111-124. {In Persian}.
[21] Pecorari, D. (2015). Plagiarism in second language writing: Is it time to close the case? Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 94-99.
[22] Pecorari, D., & Petric, B. (2014). Plagiarism in second-language writing. Language Teaching, 47, 269-302.
[23] Lotfabadi, H., Norouzi, V., & Hosseini, N. (2007). Investigating The Teaching Of Research Methodology In Psychology And Education In Iran. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations, 21, 109-140. {In Persian}.
[24] Salehi, K., & Golafshani, N. (2010). Commentary: Using Mixed Methods in Research Studies-an Opportunity with Its Challenges. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(3), 186-191.
[25] Abedi, H. A. (2009). Applying Phenomenological Method of Research in Clinical Sciences. Strategy, 19 (54), 207-224. {In Persian}.
[26] Salehi, K., Bazargan, A., Sadeghi, N., & Shokoohi-Yekta, M. (2015). Representing the Teachers' Perceptions and Lived Experiences of the Possible Damages for Implementing the Descriptive Evaluation Scheme in Primary Schools. Quarterly Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation studies, 5(9), 59-99. {In Persian}.
[27] Mohammadzadeh, Z., & Salehi, K. (2015). Pathology of scientific vitality and dynamism in scientific and academic centers: A study according to Phenomenology. Quarterly Journal of the Macro and Strategic Policies, 3(11), 1-25. {In Persian}.
[28] Mohammadzadeh, Z., & Salehi, K. (2016). Explanation of the Phenomenon of Scientific Vitality and Dynamism in Scientific Centers from Perspective of Academic Elites: A Study According to Phenomenology. Rahbord Journal, 25(79), 227-250. {In Persian}.
[29] Scanlon, P. M., & Neumann, D. R. (2002). Internet plagiarism amongcollege students. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 374-385.
[30] Smith, M., Ghazali, N., & Minhad, F. (2007). Attitudes towards plagiarism amongundergraduate accounting students: Malaysian evidence. Asian Review of Acc ounting, 15(2), 122-146.
[31] Eret, E., & Gokmenoglu, T. (2010). Plagiarism in higher education: A case study with prospectiveacademicians. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3303-3307.
[32] Cheema, Z. A., Mahmood, S. T., Mahmood, A., & Shah, M. A. (2011). Conceptual awareness of research scholars about plagiarism at higher education level: Intellectual property right and patent. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(1), 665-670.
سیاست علم و فناوری
دوره 11، شماره 4
دی 1397
صفحه 35-48

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار