[1] OECD. (2002). Frascati Manual 2002. OECD Publishing.
[2] Martin, B., & Tang, P. (2007). The Economic and Social Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, (Working Paper No.161).
[3] Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research policy, 30(3), 509-532.
[4] Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609-626). Princeton University Press.
[5] Pavitt, K. (2001). Public policies to support basic research: What can the rest of the world learn from US theory and practice? (And what they should not learn). Industrial and corporate change, 10(3), 761-779.
[6] Polanyi, M. (1962). The Republic of science. Minerva, 1(1), 54-73.
[7] Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press.
[8] Calvert, J. (2006). What’s special about basic research? Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(2), 199-220.
[9] Nelson, R. R. (1959). Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research. The J. Reprints Antitrust L. & Econ., 3, 725.
[10] Mansfield, E. (1998). Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings. Research policy, 26(7-8), 773-776.
[11] Drew, C. H., Pettibone, K. G., Finch, F. O., Giles, D., & Jordan, P. (2016). Automated research impact assessment: a new bibliometrics approach. Scientometrics, 106(3), 987-1005.
[12] Czarnitzki, D., & Thorwarth, S. (2012). Productivity effects of basic research in low-tech and high-tech industries. Research Policy, 41(9), 1555-1564.
[13] Rosenberg, N. (1990). Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Research policy, 19(2), 165-174.
[14] Callon, M. (1994). Is science a public good? fifth mullins lecture, virginia polytechnic institute, 23 march 1993. Science, Technology & Human Values, 19(4), 395-424.
[15] Pavitt, K. (1991). What makes basic research economically useful? Research policy, 20(2), 109-119.
[16] Ghazinoory, S., & Ghazinoory, S. (2014). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy; an Introduction. Tarbiat Modares University Press. ISBN: 978-600-5394-51-1. {In Persian}.
[17] Lundvall, B.-Å., & Borrás, S. (2006). Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation.
[18] Suk, W. A., Heacock, M. L., Trottier, B. A., Amolegbe, S. M., Avakian, M. D., Henry, H. F., … & Reed, L. G. (2018). Assessing the economic and societal benefits of SRP-funded research. Environmental health perspectives, 126(6), 065002.
[19] Newson, R., King, L., Rychetnik, L., Milat, A., & Bauman, A. (2018). Looking both ways: a review of methods for assessing research impacts on policy and the policy utilisation of research. Health research policy and systems, 16(1), 54.
[20] Bornmann, L. (2013). What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 217-233.
[21] Vanino, E., Roper, S., & Becker, B. (2019). Knowledge to money: Assessing the business performance effects of publicly-funded R&D grants. Research Policy.
[22] Kay, J. A., & Smith, C. L. (1985). Science policy and public spending. Fiscal Studies, 6(3), 14-23.
[23] Moussavi, A. (2018). Investigating the Role of Basic Sciences for Comprehensive Development of Developing Countries. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 9(4), 45-54. {In Persian}.
[24] Weinberg, A. M. (1965). Scientific choice, basic science and applied missions. Minerva, 3(4), 515-523.
[25] Ghaneirad, M. A. (2000). Jāme’eh-shenāsi-e Roshd va Oful-e Elm dar Irān (The Sociology of Growth and Decline of Knowledge in Iran). Madineh Press Institution, Tehran. ISBN: 9649189750. {In Persian}.
[26] Arratia, M. N. M., Lopez, I. F., Schaeffer, S. E., & Cruz-Reyes, L. (2016). Static R&D Project Portfolio Selection in Public Organizations. Decis. Support Syst., 84(C), 53-63.
[27] Weinberg, A. M. (1964). Criteria for scientific choice II: The two cultures. Minerva, 3(1), 3-14. doi:10.1007/BF01630147
[28] Guida, G. (2018). An Analysis of Scientific Research Performance in Italy: Evaluation Criteria and Public Funding. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 10(7).
[29] Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research policy, 41(2), 251-261.
[30] Hamann, J. (2016). The visible hand of research performance assessment. Higher Education, 72(6), 761-779.
[31] Bloch, C., & Schneider, J. W. (2016). Performance-based funding models and researcher behavior: An analysis of the influence of the Norwegian Publication Indicator at the individual level. Research Evaluation, 25(4), 371-382.
[32] Geuna, A., & Martin, B. R. (2003). University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison. Minerva, 41(4), 277-304.
[33] Ebadi, A., & Schiffauerova, A. (2016). iSEER: an intelligent automatic computer system for scientific evaluation of researchers. Scientometrics, 107(2), 477-498.
[34] Devyatkin, D., Suvorov, R., Tikhomirov, I., & Grigoriev, O. (2018). Scientific Research Funding Criteria: An Empirical Study of Peer Review and Scientometrics. In Practical Issues of Intelligent Innovations (pp. 277-292). Springer.
[35] Martin, B. R., & Irvine, J. (1983). Assessing basic research: Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research Policy, 12(2), 61-90.
)
