[1] Brattström, E., & Hellström, T. (2019). Street-level priority-setting: The role of discretion in implementation of research, development, and innovation priorities. Energy Policy, 127, 240-247.
[2] Fallah, H., & Jahanbaz, A. (2011). Designing a method for prioritizing and budgeting research topics aimed at developing economic activities. Science and Technology Policy, 3(3), 79-92. {In Persian}.
[3] Grebenyuk, A., Shahsnov, S., & Sokolov, A. (2016). S&T Priority Setting. International Practices and the Case of Russia. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP, 67.
[4] Gassler, H., Polt, W., Schindler, J., Weber, M., Mahroum, S., Kubeczko, K., & Keenan, M. (2004). Priorities in science and technology policy-an international comparison. Project Report). Vienna/Seibersdorf: Institut fur Technologie-und Regionalpolitik.
[5] Godinho, M. M., & Caraça, J. (2009, October). Setting research priorities: A taxonomy of policy models. In 2009 Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy (pp. 1-10). IEEE.
[6] Hellström, T., Jacob, M., & Sjöö, K. (2017). From thematic to organizational prioritization: the challenges of implementing RDI priorities. Science and Public Policy, 44(5), 599-608.
[7] Gassler, H., Polt, W., & Rammer, C. (2007). Priority Setting in Research & Technology Policy: Historical Developments and Recent Trends (No. 36-2007). Working paper.
[8] Stewart, J. (1995). Models of priority-setting for public sector research. Research Policy, 24(1), 115-126.
[9] Salo, A., & Liesiö, J. (2006). A case study in participatory priority setting for a Scandinavian research program. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 5(01), 65-88.
[10] OECD. (2009). Enhancing Research Performance through Evaluation, Impact Assessment and Priority Setting.
[11] Ghazinoory, S., & Ghazinoori, S. (2017). An introduction to science, technology, and innovation policy. Tarbiat Modares University publication. {In Persian}.
[12] Bagheri Moghaddam, N., Sahhaf Zadeh, M., Emamian, S., & Iran Khah, A. (2008). Choosing the suitable approach in determining technology research priorities: Membrane technology at the National Iranian Gas Company. Science and Technology Policy, 1(4), 1-11. {In Persian}.
[13] Unido. (2004). Foresight methodology, Training Module 2.
[14] Thornton, P. K., Whitbread, A., Baedeker, T., Cairns, J., Claessens, L., Baethgen, W., ... & Howden, M. (2018). A framework for priority-setting in climate smart agriculture research. Agricultural Systems, 167, 161-17.
[15] Mortazavi, M., Ranaei, H., & Abbasi, H. (2011). The application of Multi Attribute Decision Methods (MADM) on prioritizing Iranian fisheries research projects. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences, 10(1), 47-66.
[16] Georghiou, L., & Harper, J. C. (2011). From priority-setting to articulation of demand: Foresight for research and innovation policy and strategy. Futures, 43(3), 243-251.
[17] Georghiou, L., Elvira Uyarra, A., Saliba Scerri, R., Castillo, N., & Cassingena Harper, J. (2014). Adapting smart specialisation to a micro-economy–the case of Malta. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 428-447.
[18] Janssen, W., Kassam, A., & de Janvry, A. (2003). A regional approach to setting research priorities and implementation: Towards satisfying national, regional and global concerns. Journal of agricultural & food information, 5(2), 67-100.
[19] Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: toward smart innovation policies. Growth and change, 44(2), 355-389.
[20] McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291-1302.
[21] European Commission. (2012). Guide to Regional/National Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3). European Commission, Bruxelles.
[22] Hepburn, N. C. (2014). Minding the Gap Between Promise and Performance: The Ontario Liberal Government's Research and Innovation Policy, 2003-2011 (Doctoral dissertation).
[23] Krammer, S. M. (2017). Science, technology, and innovation for economic competitiveness: The role of smart specialization in less-developed countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 95-107.
[24] Sjoer, E., Nørgaard, B., & Goossens, M. (2012). Opportunities and Challenges in the Implementation of the Knowledge Triangle. 40th annual conference of Societe Europeenne pour la Formation des Ingenieurs (SEFI), 23-26.
[25] Uyarra, E. (2007). Key Dilemmas of Regional Innovation Policies 1. Innovation, 20(3), 243-261.
[26] Paliokaitė, A., Martinaitis, Ž., & Sarpong, D. (2016). Implementing smart specialisation roadmaps in Lithuania: Lost in translation?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, 143-152.
[27] Majidpour, M., & Namdarian, L. (2015). Identifying Barriers to the Implementation of Iran’s documents of science and technology policy. Innovation Management, 4(4), 31-60. {In Persian}.
[28] Rahbar, A., Nasr Esfahani, A., & Askarian, M. (2014). Reflections on Iran’s comprehensive scientific map in order to enrich the future editions of the map. Industrial Technology Development Journal, 12(23), 41-58. {In Persian}.
[29] Zaker Salehi, G., & Zaker Salehi, A. (2009). Analyzing the content of Iran’s comprehensive scientific map draft and proposing its evaluation model. Science and Technology Policy, 2(2), 29-46. {In Persian}.
[30] Izadi, S., & Varedi, S. (2017). Critisizing Iran’s comprehensive scientific map from a strategic planning perspective. 1st Conference of Governance and Public Policy. {In Persian}.
)
