[1] Lee, K. (2013). How can Korea be a role model for catch-up development? A ‘capability-based’view. Achieving Development Success: Strategies and Lessons from the Developing World, 25.
[2] Lawrence, T. B., & Phillips, N. (2004). From Moby Dick to Free Willy: Macro-cultural discourse and institutional entrepreneurship in emerging institutional fields. Organization, 11(5), 689-711.
[3] Hamidi, R., & Isaei, M., & Babaei, A. (2017). Embeddedness of State-Pioneer Entrepreneurs and Technological Change; The Case of Biopharmecutal Catch-Up in Iran. Journal of Science and Technology policy, 8(4), 1-19. {In Persian}.
[4] Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2015). A theory of fields. Oxford University Press.
[5] Dorado, S. (2013). Small groups as context for institutional entrepreneurship: An exploration of the emergence of commercial microfinance in Bolivia. Organization Studies, 34(4), 533-557.
[6] Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40-47.
[7] Cusumano, M. A., Kahl, S. J., & Suarez, F. F. (2015). Services, industry evolution, and the competitive strategies of product firms. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 559-575.
[8] Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (2004). The demography of corporations and industries. Princeton University Press.
[9] Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L., & Winter, S. (2016). Innovation and the Evolution of Industries: History-Friendly Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/CBO9781107280120
[10] DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (Vol. 17). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[11] Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage Publications.
[12] Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy Of Management Journal, 47(5), 657-679.
[13] Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277-300.
[14] Lounsbury, M., Ventresca, M., & Hirsch, P. M. (2003). Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: a cultural–political perspective on US recycling. Socio-Economic Review, 1(1), 71-104.
[15] Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52-58.
[16] Rizvandi, M. A., Sahabi, B., Yavari, K., & Momeni, F. (2017). A critical assessment of neoclassical economics in the problem transition to the knowledge- based economy: an institutional approach. Journal Of Science and Technology Policy, 9(1), 17-30. {In Persian}.
[17] Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power, 1.
[18] Battilana, J. (2006). Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, 13(5), 653-676.
[19] Hargrave, T. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 864-888.
[20] Dorado, S. (2005). Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening. Organization studies, 26(3), 385-414.
[21] Schrank, A., and Whitford, J. (2009). Industrial Policy in the United States: A NeoPolanyian Interpretation. Politics & Society, 37(4), 521-553.
[22] Lester, R., and Piore, M. J. (2004). Innovation: The Missing Dimension. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[23] Hung, S. C., & Whittington, R. (2011). Agency in national innovation systems: Institutional entrepreneurship and the professionalization of Taiwanese IT. Research Policy, 40(4), 526-538.
[24] Battelle Memorial Institute. (2004). Positioning Arizona for the Next Big Technology Wave: Investment Prospectus to Create a Sustainable Systems Industry in Arizona. Cleveland: BMI.
[25] Van de Ven, A. H., & Garud, R. (1994). The coevolution of technical and institutional events in the development of an innovation. Evolutionary dynamics of organizations, 425, 443.
[26] Fuchs, E. R. (2010). Rethinking the role of the state in technology development: DARPA and the case for embedded network governance. Research Policy, 39(9), 1133-1147.
[27] Lindquist, E. A. (2001). Discerning Policy Influence: Framework for a Strategic Evaluation of IDRC-Supported Research.
[28] Fisher, C. (2010). Knowledge Brokering and Intermediary concepts. Impact and Learning Team, Institute of Development Studies.
[29] Hoppe, R. (2010). From “knowledge use” towards “boundary work”: sketch of an emerging new agenda for inquiry into science-policy interaction. In Knowledge Democracy (pp. 169-186). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[30] Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2002). Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 281-290.
[31] Suddaby, R. (2010). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 14-20.
[32] Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2017). Institutional entrepreneurship and change in fields (pp. 261-280). London: Sage Publications.
[33] Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA.
[34] https://bit.ly/2Qs7Phl
[35] Evans, P. (2010). Constructing the 21st century developmental state:potentialities and pitfalls, constructing a democratic developmnetal state in south Africa. edited by edigheji, O. HSRC Press.
[36] Rodrik, D. (2009). Industrial policy: don't ask why, ask how. Middle East Development Journal, 1(1), 1-29.
[37] Mintzberg, H. (2015). Rebalancing society: radical renewal beyond left, right, and center. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
)