[1] Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371-385.
[2] Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (2002). Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 747-767.
[3] Reuer, J. J., & Zollo, M. (2005). Termination outcomes of research alliances. Research Policy, 34(1), 101-115.
[4] Radosevic, S. (1999). International technology transfer and catch-up in economic development. Edward Elgar Publishing. pp 1-13.
[5] Arranz, N., & de Arroyabe, J. F. (2006). Joint R&D projects: Experiences in the context of European technology policy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(7), 860-885.
[6] Robertson, T. S., & Gatignon, H. (1998). Technology development mode: a transaction cost conceptualization. Strategic Management Journal, 515-531.
[7] Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 567-586.
[8] Faccin, K., Balestrin, A., & Bortolaso, I. (2016). The joint R&D project: The case of the first Brazilian microcontroller chip. Revista de Administração (São Paulo), 51(1), 87-102.
[9] Jones, C., & Lichtenstein, B. B. (2008). Temporary Inter-organizational Projects. In The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations.
[10] Saenz, J., & Perez-Bouvier, A. (2014). Interaction with external agents, innovation networks, and innovation capability: the case of Uruguayan software firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18, 447-468.
[11] Spanos, Y. E., Vonortas, N. S., & Voudouris, I. (2015). Antecedents of innovation impacts in publicly funded collaborative R&D projects. Technovation, 36, 53-64.
[12] Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms - Evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 209-223.
[13] Pisano, G. P. (1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 153-176.
[14] Lööf, H., & Broström, A. (2008). Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness? Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(1), 73-90.
[15] Aschhoff, B., & Schmidt, T. (2008). Empirical evidence on the success of R&D cooperation—happy together? Review of Industrial Organization, 33(1), 41-62.
[16] Lhuillery, S., & Pfister, E. (2009). R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data. Research Policy, 38(1), 45-57.
[17] Frankort, H. T. (2016). When does knowledge acquisition in R&D alliances increase new product development? The moderating roles of technological relatedness and product-market competition. Research Policy, 45(1), 291-302.
[18] Hagedoorn, J. (2012). Wang N. Is there complementarity or substitutability between internal and external R&D strategies? Research Policy, 41(6), 1072-1083.
[19] Gkypali, A., Filiou, D., & Tsekouras, K. (2017). R&D collaborations: Is diversity enhancing innovation performance? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 143-152.
[20] Naghizadeh, M., Tabatabaeian. S. H., Manteghi, M., Hanafizadeh. P., & Naghizadeh, R. (2012). A Model of Absorptive Capacity Improvement by Focusing on Organizational Strategic Orientation and Managerial Perception of Environmental Dynamicity in the Firms of Avionic Sector. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 4(4), 25-36. {In Persian}.
[21] Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 23(4), 660-679.
[22] Hertzfeld, H. R., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2006). Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy, 35(6), 825-838.
[23] Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. (2001). Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: A conceptual framework of alliance failure. Organization science, 12(1), 37-53.
[24] Ruuska, I., & Teigland, R. (2009). Ensuring project success through collective competence and creative conflict in public-private partnerships - A case study of Bygga Villa, a Swedish triple helix e-government initiative. International Journal of Project Management, 27(4), 323-334.
[25] König, B., Diehl, K., Tscherning. K., & Helming, K. (2013). A framework for structuring interdisciplinary research management. Research Policy, 42(1), 261-272.
[26] Adler, N., Elmquist, M., & Norrgren, F. (2009). The challenge of managing boundary-spanning research activities: Experiences from the Swedish context. Research Policy, 38(7), 1136-1149.
[27] Procca, A. E. (2008). Development of a project management model for a government research and development organization. Project Management Journa, 39(4), 33-57.
[28] vom Brocke, J., & Lippe, S. (2015). Managing collaborative research projects: A synthesis of project management literature and directives for future research. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1022-1039.
[29] Bstieler, L., & Hemmert, M. (2015). The effectiveness of relational and contractual governance in new product development collaborations: Evidence from Korea. Technovation, 45-46, 29-39.
[30] Naghizadeh, M., Manteghi, M., Ranga, M., & Naghizadeh, R. (2017). Managing integration in complex product systems: The experience of the IR-150 aircraft design program. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 253-261.
[31] Barkema, H. G., Shenkar, O., Vermeulen, F., & Bell, J. H. (1997). Working abroad, working with others: How firms learn to operate international joint ventures. Academy of Management journal, 40(2), 426-442.
[32] Busom, I., & Fernández-Ribas, A. (2008). The impact of firm participation in R&D programmes on R&D partnerships. Research policy, 37(2), 240-257.
[33] Johnson, W. H. (2008). Roles, resources and benefits of intermediate organizations supporting triple helix collaborative R&D: The case of Precarn. Technovation, 28(8), 495-505.
[34] Norouzi, E., Tabatabaeian, S. H., & Ghazinouri, S. S. (2016). Assessing The Effect Of Intermediary Institutions In Addressing The Weaknesses Of The Nis Functions Of Iran. Journal of Science and Technology Policy. 8(1), 15-26. {In Persian}.
[35] Dosi, G., & Nelson. R. R. (2013). The evolution of technologies: an assessment of the state-of-the-art. Eurasian Business Review, 3(1), 3-46.
[36] Teece, D. J. (2006). Reflections on "Profiting from Innovation". Research Policy, 35(8 SPEC. ISS.), 1131-1146.
[37] Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research, Design and Methods. Vol. 26. SAGE Publications. pp 93-96.
[38] Weick, K. E. (2007). The generative properties of richness. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 14-19.
[39] Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. In Qualitative data analysis: a sourcebook of new methods. Sage publications.
[40] Ja’fari, H. A., Taslimi, M., Faghihi, A., & Sheikhzade, M. (2011). Thematic Analysis and Thematic Networks: A Simple and Efficient Method for Exploring Patterns Embedded in Qualitative Data Municipalities. Strategic Management thought, 5(2), 151-198.
[41] Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 1-34.
)