کارکردهای واسطه‌های نوآوری در فرآیند همکاری‌های فناورانه بین بنگاهی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه سیاست نوآوری و آینده‌نگاری، پژوهشکده مطالعات فناوری، تهران، ایران.

2 پژوهشگر، گروه سیاست نوآوری و آینده‌نگاری، پژوهشکده مطالعات فناوری، تهران، ایران.

10.22034/jstp.2024.11678.1791

چکیده

همکاری‌های فناورانه بین بنگاهی به‌ویژه بین بنگاه‌های بزرگ صنعتی و شرکت‌های کوچک فناوری، برای خلق نوآوری و تحقق اقتصاد مبتنی بر دانش ضروری است؛ با‌این‌حال همکاری‌های بین بنگاهی اغلب با چالش‌هایی همراه است که نیازمند نقش‌آفرینی واسطه‌های نوآوری است. باتوجه‌به نقش قابل توجه واسطه‌های تبادل در نظام نوآوری، شناسایی کارکردهای مورد انتظار از آن‌ها برای توسعه همکاری‌های فناورانه، باتوجه‌به ویژگی‌های زمینه‌ای (مانند شرایط کشورهای در حال توسعه مثل ایران) راهگشا خواهد بود. در این راستا پژوهش حاضر به‌دنبال استخراج و دسته‌بندی مجموعه کارکردهای واسطه‌های نوآوری است که به‌صورت خاص متمرکز بر همکاری‌های فناورانه بین بنگاهی هستند. این پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی انجام شده و در این راستا مصاحبه‌هایی با 29 نفر از صاحب‌نظران و فعالان حوزه واسطه‌گری نوآوری در کشور صورت‌گرفته است. متن مصاحبه‌ها با استفاده از روش تحلیل مضمون، تحلیل و کدگذاری شده و در نهایت مجموعه‌ای از کارکردهای واسطه‌های نوآوری استخراج شدند. کارکردهای شناسایی‌شده باتوجه‌به ابعاد مختلف فرآیند همکاری‌های فناورانه بین بنگاهی در قالب 8 دسته کلی دسته‌بندی شدند که عبارت‌اند از: «تحریک تقاضا»، «شناسایی نیاز و بیان تقاضا»، «بررسی واقعی بودن و اهمیت نیاز متقاضی»، «طراحی و مدیریت پروژه‌های بزرگ و پیچیده»، «انتخاب فناوری و همکار مناسب»، «مدیریت همکاری و تعاملات بین طرفین همکاری»، «اثبات عملکرد فناوری» و «کمک به توسعه بازار». در پژوهش حاضر به کارکردهایی اشاره‌ شده که در مطالعات قبلی کم‌تر به آن‌ها توجه ‌شده بود که از جمله می‌توان به کارکردهای ذیل دسته‌های «بررسی واقعی بودن و اهمیت نیاز متقاضی» و «طراحی و مدیریت پروژه‌های بزرگ و پیچیده» اشاره کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Functions of Innovation Intermediaries in the Process of Inter-firm Technological Collaborations

نویسندگان [English]

  • Arman khaledi 1
  • Reza Asadifard 1
  • Reza Mirzaei Douraki 2
1 Assistant professor, Innovation Policy and foresight, Technology Studies Institute, Tehran. Iran
2 Researcher, Innovation Policy and foresight, Technology Studies Institute, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Inter-firm technological collaborations, particularly between large industrial enterprises and small technology firms, are essential for fostering innovation and achieving a knowledge-based economy. However, such collaborations often encounter challenges that necessitate the involvement of innovation intermediaries. Given the significant role of exchange intermediaries in the innovation system, identifying their expected functions for enhancing technological collaborations, especially considering contextual characteristics (such as the conditions of developing countries like Iran), will be beneficial. This study aims to extract and categorize the functions of innovation intermediaries specifically focused on inter-firm technological collaborations. The research adopts a qualitative approach, conducting interviews with 29 experts and practitioners in the field of innovation intermediation in the country. The interview transcripts were analyzed and coded using thematic analysis, ultimately resulting in a set of functions for innovation intermediaries. The identified functions were categorized into eight main groups based on various aspects of the inter-firm technological collaboration process: "demand stimulation", "need identification and demand articulation", "assessing the reality and importance of the client's need", "designing and managing large and complex projects", "selecting appropriate technology and partners", "managing collaboration and interactions between parties", "technology performance validation" and "market development assistance." This study highlights functions that have received less attention in previous research, particularly those under the categories of "assessing the reality and importance of the client's need" and "designing and managing large and complex projects."

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Innovation intermediaries
  • Technological collaboration
  • Intermediary functions
  • Inter-firm cooperation

مراجع

[1] Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press.
[2] Liu, X., Shou, Y., & Xie, Y. (2013). The Role of Intermediary Organizations in Enhancing the Innovation Capability of MSMEs: Evidence from a Chinese Case. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(sup2), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2013.819246
[3] Kirkels, Y., & Duysters, G. (2010). Brokerage in SME Networks. Research Policy, 39(3), 375-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.005
[4] Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the Role of Intermediaries in Innovation. Research policy, 35(5), 715-728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
[5] Sapsed, J., Grantham, A., & DeFillippi, R. (2007). A Bridge over Troubled Waters: Bridging Organisations and Entrepreneurial Opportunities in Emerging Sectors. Research Policy, 36(9), 1314-1334 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.003.
[6] Kilelu, C. W., Klerkx, L., Leeuwis, C., & Hall, A. (2011). Beyond Knowledge Brokering: an Exploratory Study on Innovation Intermediaries in an Evolving Smallholder Agricultural System in Kenya. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 7(1), 84-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/19474199.2011.593859
[7] Mantel, S., & Rosegger, G. (1987). The Role of Third-parties in the Diffusion of Innovations: a Survey. Innovation: Adaptation and growth, 123-134.
[8] Bessant, J., & Rush, H. (1995). Building Bridges for Innovation: the Role of Consultants in Technology Transfer. Research policy, 24(1), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00751-E
[9] Stankiewicz, R. (1995). The Role of the Science and Technology Infrastructure in the Development and Diffusion of Industrial Automation in Sweden. In Technological systems and economic performance: The case of factory automation (pp. 165-210). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0145-5_6
[10] Provan, K. G., & Human, S. E. (1999). Organizational Learning and the Role of the Network Broker in Small-firm Manufacturing Networks. Interfirm networks: Organization and industrial competitiveness, 185-207. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203022481.ch7
[11] Gascó, M. (2017). Living Labs: Implementing Open Innovation in the Public Sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 90-98 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.09.003.
[12] Rossi, F., Colovic, A., Caloffi, A., & Russo, M. (2020). Public Innovation Intermediaries and Digital Co-creation. Research contribution to the OECD TIP Co-creation project”. Accessible online [as of 9/12/2020]: https://stip.oecd.org/stip/knowledge-transfer/casestudies
[13] Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2020). The Limits to Collaboration Across Four of the Most Innovative UK Industries. British Journal of Management, 31(4), 830-855. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12353
[14] Azad, n., & Hosseini, h. (2018). Identifying the Functions of Open Innovation Intermediaries with the Focus Group Approach. Quarterly journal of Industrial Technology Development, 16(33), 65-84. {In Persian}. https://jtd.iranjournals.ir/article_32416.html?lang=en
[15] Khassaf Mofrad, H. & Danaeifard, H. (2015). Desired Functions of Innovation Intermediaries for Enhancing Innovational Capacity in Knowledge-Based Firms. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 8(3), 1-22.  {In Persian}. https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12930_26c697b19699d3161ab93d6e8f99e8da.pdf?lang=en
[16] Hashem, f., Ghazinoory, s., & Radfar, r. (2023). The Interpretive-Structural Model for Prioritize the Relationship among Effective Factors on Innovation Intermediation in Iran. Quarterly journal of Industrial Technology Development, 21(53), 45-62. {In Persian}. https://jtd.iranjournals.ir/article_701956.html?lang=en
[17] Norouzi, E., Tabatabaeeian, S. H., & Ghazinoori, S. S. (2016). Assessing the Effect of Intermediary Institutions in Addressing the Weaknesses of the NIS Functions of Iran. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 9(1), 15-26. {In Persian}. https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12945.html?lang=en
[18] Batterink, M. H., Wubben, E. F., Klerkx, L., & Omta, S. (2010). Orchestrating Innovation Networks: The Case of Innovation Brokers in the Agri-food Sector. Entrepreneurship and regional development, 22(1), 47-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903220512
[19] Katzy, B., Turgut, E., Holzmann, T., & Sailer, K. (2013). Innovation Intermediaries: a Process View on Open Innovation Coordination. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(3), 295-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.764982
[20] Gould, R. V., & Fernandez, R. M. (1989). Structures of Mediation: A Formal Approach to Brokerage in Transaction Networks. Sociological methodology, 89-126. https://doi.org/10.2307/270949
[21] Wolpert, J. D. (2002). Breaking out of the Innovation Box. Harvard business review, 80(8), 76-83, 148. https://hbr.org/2002/08/breaking-out-of-the-innovation-box
[22] Burt, M. (1992). The Justification for Applying the Effective-mass Approximation to Microstructures. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 4(32), 6651. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/4/32/003
[23] Fleming, L., & Waguespack, D. M. (2007). Brokerage, Boundary Spanning, and Leadership in Open Innovation Communities. Organization science, 18(2), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0242
[24] Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation. Journal of product innovation management, 31(3), 417-433.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105
[25] Kohler, T. (2016). Corporate Accelerators: Building Bridges between Corporations and Startups. Business horizons, 59(3), 347-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.01.008
[26] Weiblen, T., & Chesbrough, H. W. (2015). Engaging with Startups to Enhance Corporate Innovation. California management review, 57(2), 66-90. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.2.66
[27] Stewart, J., & Hyysalo, S. (2008). Intermediaries, Users and Social Learning in Technological Innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(03), 295-325. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919608002035
[28] Klerkx, L., Hall, A., & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Strengthening Agricultural Innovation Capacity: Are Innovation Brokers the Answer? International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 8(5-6), 409-438 https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/strengthening-agricultural-innovation-capacity-are-innovation-bro
[29] Brown, D., Kivimaa, P., & Sorrell, S. (2019). An Energy Leap? Business Model Innovation and Intermediation in the ‘Energiesprong’retrofit Initiative. Energy Research & Social Science, 58, 101253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101253
[30] Ngongoni, C. N. (2021). The Role of Innovation Intermediaries in Developing Healthcare Innovation Ecosystems: Value Co-creation through Platforms. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/109814
[31] Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2009). Establishment and Embedding of Innovation Brokers at Different Innovation System Levels: Insights from the Dutch Agricultural Sector. Technological forecasting and social change, 76(6), 849-860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001
[32] Van Lente, H., Hekkert, M., Smits, R., & Van Waveren, B. (2003). Roles of Systemic Intermediaries in Transition Processes. International journal of Innovation management, 7(03), 247-279. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919603000817
[33] Intarakumnerd, P., & Chaoroenporn, P. (2013). The Roles of Intermediaries in Sectoral Innovation System in Developing Countries: Public Organizations versus Private Organizations. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(1), 108-119 https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2013.810949
[34] Ansari, A., & Dornberger, U. (2020). How Do Intermediary Organizations Support SMEs to Enhance their Absorptive Capacity? VNU JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 36(5E). https://js.vnu.edu.vn/EAB/article/view/4456
[35] Kanda, W., Gonzaléz, P. d. R., Hjelm, O., & Bienkowska, D. (2015). A Function of Innovation Systems Approach for Analysing the Roles of Intermediaries in Eco-innovation. Global Cleaner Production and Sustainable Consumption Conference, 1-4 November, Sitges-Barcelona, Spain, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.230
[36] Kivimaa, P. (2014). Government-affiliated Intermediary Organisations as Actors in System-Level Transitions. Research policy, 43(8), 1370-1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.007
[37] Petersen, I.-h., Kruss, G., McGrath, S., & Gastrow, M. (2016). Bridging Skills Demand and Supply in South Africa: The Role of Public and Private Intermediaries. Development Southern Africa, 33(3), 407-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2016.1156518
[38] Hossain, M. (2012). Performance and Potential of Open Innovation Intermediaries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 754-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1053
[39] Hannon, M. J., Skea, J., & Rhodes, A. (2014, August). Facilitating and Coordinating UK Energy Innovation through Systemic Innovation Intermediaries. In International Conference on Sustainability Transitions (pp. 27-29).
[40] Kim, E. S. (2015). Facilitating Innovation in SMEs: the Case of Public Intermediaries in South Korea. The University of Edinburgh https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:168543646}
 

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار