]1[ Nasri, SH., Ghazinoori, S. & Radaei, N. (2023). Mission-oriented Typology of Public Research Institutions in the National Innovation System. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 15(4), 1-12. {In Persian}.
DOI: 10.22034/jstp.2022.13948
]2[ Intarakumnerd P, Goto A. Role of public research institutes in national innovation systems in industrialized countries: The cases of Fraunhofer, NIST, CSIRO, AIST, and ITRI. Research Policy. 2018 Sep 1;47(7):1309–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.011
]3[ Sajedinejad A, Hassannayebi E, Ganji A. Performance Evaluation Model for Research Institutes Using an Improved Balanced Scorecard and DEMATEL Technique. Rahyaft. 2020 Jun 21;30(78):19–36. https://doi.org/10.22034/rahyaft.2020.13830
]4[ Taherkhani A. Designing a performance evaluation model using BSC in knowledge-based organizations [Master’s thesis]. Faculty of Management, University of Tehran; 2015.
]5[ Mehregan MR, Zali MR. Designing and explaining the performance evaluation system of industrial research centers. Journal of Managment Knowledge. 17(3):91–107.
]6[ Samadian MS, Chavoshi SK, Mennati H. Identifying and determining the optimal model for evaluating the performance of Naja research centers. Resource Management in the Police. 2017;5(17):56–31.
]7[ Kazemi HK, Bagheri F, Nasri Nasrabadi S. Evaluating the Performance of Research Centers by organizational Excellence Model Approach; Case Study: National Research Institute for Science Policy. Journal of Science and Technology Policy. 2016 Dec 21;9(4):77–93.
]8[ Hajian A, Ahmadvand AM, Movahedi M. Performance evaluation model of non-industrial research organizations. Journals Management System. 5(2):81–105.
]9[ Sheikhan N, Bakhtiarinezhad F. Designing and Implementation of Performance Evaluation Model for Research Centers. Journal of Industry and University. 2019 Oct;20(19):21.
]10[ Montazer GA, Sharanjani M, Moradipoor H, Farzkish M. Sanandaj handbook: evaluation model of the country’s research institutes. Tehran: University Publication Center; 2020.
]11[ Tijssen RJW. Anatomy of use-inspired researchers: From Pasteur’s Quadrant to Pasteur’s Cube model. Research Policy. 2018;47(9):1626–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.010
]12[ Stokes DE. Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press; 1997.
]13[ Birkland TA. An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Makin. 2nd Edition. New York: M. E. Sharpe.; 2005.
]14[ Denham A, Garnett M. “A Hollowed Out Tradition? British Think Tanks in the Twenty First Century”, Diane Stone and Andrew Denham (Eds.), Think Tank Traditions: Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2004.
]15[ Abelson D. Do Think Tanks Matter? Opportunities, Constraints and Incentives for Think Tanks in Canada and the United States. Global Society. 2000 Apr 1;14:213–36.
]16[ Özgür H, Kulaç O. An Analysis of the Studies on Think Tanks Success and Ranking. European Scientific Journal. 2015;2:73–90. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2015.v11n10p%25p
]17[ Abelson DE, Carberry CM. Following suit or falling behind? A comparative analysis of think tanks in Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique. 1998;31(3):525–55.
]18[ Karimi T. New models of organizational performance evaluation. Tadbir. 2006;
]19[ Smismans S. Policy Evaluation in the EU: The Challenges of Linking Ex Ante and Ex Post Appraisal. Eur j risk regul. 2015 Mar;6(1):6–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00004244
]20[Ghazinoory, S., Farazkish, M., Montazer, G. A., & Soltani, B. (2017).
Designing a national science and technology evaluation system based on a new typology of international practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 119-127.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.012
]21[ Farazkish M, Dastranj N. Selecting and Applying Science, Technology and Innovation Evaluation Indices. Journal of Science and Technology Policy. 2019 Jun 22; 12(2):579–98. dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20080840.1398.12.2.38.3
]22[ McGann JG. The competition for dollars, scholars and influence in the public policy research industry. Dissertations available from ProQuest. 1991 Jan 1;1–381.
]23[ McGann JG. Best Practices for Funding and Evaluating Think Tanks and Public Policy Research. Amber, PA: McGann Associates. 2006;
]24[ Struyk RJ. Managing think tanks: practical guidance for maturing organizations. Expanded 2nd ed. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Initiative, Open Society Institute; 2006. 350 p. (LGI books).
]25[ Bennett S, Corluka A, Doherty J, Tangcharoensathien V. Approaches to developing the capacity of health policy analysis institutes: a comparative case study. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2012 Mar 5;10(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-10-7
]26[ Brown, E., Knox, A., Tolmie, C., Gugerty, M. K., Kosack, S., & Fabrizio, A. Linking Think Tank Performance, Decisions, and Context. 2014;
]27[ McGann J. 2020 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report. TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports [Internet]. 2021 Jan 28; Available from: https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/18
]28[ McGann JG. Global Go To Think Tank Index & Abridged Report. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. 2013;
]29[ James P, Abelson DE, Lusztig M. Myth of the Sacred: The Charter, the Courts, and the Politics of the Constitution in Canada. McGill-Queen’s Press - MQUP; 2002. 271 p.
]30[ Alcazar L, Balarín M, Weerakoon D, Eboh E. Final Report - Learning to monitor think tanks impact: Three experiences from Africa, Asia and Latin America. 2012 Oct [cited 2022 Dec 14]; Available from: https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/handle/10625/50591
]31[ Arellano A, Dalaqua RH, Echt L, Guruli I, Reszkető P. Learning Together: Performance Self Assessments for Think Tanks. 2015;
]32[ Gang L, Simin W, Jingya Z, Yi D, Qi W, Tingting G, et al. The 2017 China Think Tank Index Report: Methodology and Think Tank Rankings. 2017;
]33[ Włoch R, Xhindi N. think tanks in Albania: a case of a flawed power-knowledge nexus. The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies. 2020 Dec 14;(2):143–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/CJPS.2020.020
]34[ Braml J. U.S. and German Think Tanks in Comparative Perspective. German policy studies [Internet]. 2006 Sep 22 [cited 2022 Dec 14]; Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/U.S.-and-German-Think-Tanks-in-Comparative-Braml/ffffae47b9555cbea782d71e71262731e64300b2
]35[ Christoplos I, Moran G, Bjarnesen J. Review of five South Africa based think tanks supported by Sida: Final report. SIDA Decentralised Evaluation. 2015;31.
]36[ Xu P. Evaluation of and Research on the Effectiveness of Social Think Tanks – A Case of Center for China & Globalization (CCG). Journal of Public Management Research. 2017 Mar 6;3(1):17–28. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpmr.v3i1.10814
]37[ Zhu X. The influence of think tanks in the Chinese policy process: Big Data Report on Chinese Think Tanks. China Think Tank Big Data Evaluation Project School of Public Policy and Management. Tsinghua University. 2016;
]38[ Samandar Ali Eshtehardi Mo, Goodarzi M, Ghorbani MH. Strategies to fulfill the mission of education in the entrepreneurial university: a framework synthesis and focus group study. Rahyaft. 2021;
]39[ Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S. Design science in information systems research. MIS quarterly. 2004;75–105.
]40[ Chyung SY (Yonnie), Roberts K, Swanson I, Hankinson A. Evidence-Based Survey Design: The Use of a Midpoint on the Likert Scale. Performance Improvement [Internet]. 2017 Nov 1; Available from: https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/ipt_facpubs/87
)