Innovation and Isomrphic Reforms Limits in Public Finance Management Reforms

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph. D. Candidate in Monetary Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. MPAID graduate, Harvard Kennedy School of government, Cambrige, MA. USA

2 Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Yazd University Yazd, Iran

Abstract

From a macroeconomic perspective, the financial health of a government—and by extension, the entire country—is reflected in its debt sustainability and budget deficit. These indicators stem from the nation's public finance management (PFM) capacity. Over the past three decades, there has been significant investment in transferring financial and fiscal knowledge from advanced economies, along with adopting information technology solutions inspired by best practices and advanced economies. Despite these efforts, the results of such financial investments and the development of PFM innovations and technologies have often fallen short of expectations. This study employs the theory of 'institutional isomorphism' to explore why public finance innovations frequently yield suboptimal outcomes. It finds that the effects of institutional isomorphism are limited when the dimensions of reforms are not visible to external observers, pertain directly to the core activities of the organization, or involve a decentralized set of stakeholders who adhere to differing professional norms and derive legitimacy from various sources. This research evaluates these constraints in 76 developing countries between 2016 and 2023, controlling for political and economic factors. It concludes that PFM reform initiatives that are downstream, operational, decentralized, involve dispersed stakeholders, and have multi-year scopes are less likely to be successful, with respective odds ratios of 0.65, 0.83, 0.85, and 0.56. Conversely, initiatives involving centralized actors or overseen by such actors (through indirect citizen supervision via parliament) are more likely to enhance quality, with a higher probability of success, indicated by odds ratios of 1.32 and 1.28.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

 
References
[1] Schick, A. (2013). Reflections on two decades of public financial management reforms. Public financial management and its emerging architecture, 21-78.
[2] Amoako, G. K., Adam, A. M., Arthur, C. L., & Tackie, G. (2021). Institutional isomorphism, environmental management accounting and environmental accountability: A review. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 11201-11216. doi:10.1007/s10668-020-01112-2
[3] Andrews, M. (2011). Which organizational attributes are amenable to external reform? An empirical study of African public financial management. International Public Management Journal, 14(2), 131-156. doi:10.1080/10967494.2011.591802
[4] Andrews, M., Cangiano, M., Cole, N., de Renzio, P., Krause, P., & Seligmann, R. (2014). This is PFM (No. 285). Center for International Development at Harvard University.
[5] Mohaghar, A., Saghafi, F., Mokhtarzade, N., & Azadegan-Mehr, M. (2020). Anticipating Technological Transition Path in Iran's Financial Sector Based on MultiLevel Perspective. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 11(4), 77-98. {In Persian}. DOI: 10.22034/jstp.2020.11.4.1066
[6] De Renzio, P., Andrews, M., & Mills, Z. (2011). Does donor support to public financial management reforms in developing countries work. An Analytical Study of Quantitative Cross-Country Evidence. London: Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
[7] Porter, D., Andrews, M., Turkewitz, J.A., & Wescott, C.G. (2011). Managing public finance and procurement in fragile and conflicted settings. International Public Management Journal, 14(4), 369-394. doi:10.1080/10967494.2011.656178
[8] Jafari, M. H., Mahmudzadeh, A., Nili, M. (2023). Impact of Fiscal Measures on the Infection Rate of COVID–19. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 2 8 (96), 53-85. doi.org/10.22054/ijer.2023.73642.1186
[9] Pritchett, L., Woolcock, M., & Andrews, M. (2013). Looking like a state: techniques of persistent failure in state capability for implementation. The Journal of Development Studies, 49(1), 1-18. doi:10.1080/00220388.2012.709615
[10] Allen, R., & Last, D. (2007). Low-income countries need to upgrade financial management. IMF Survey, 36(11), 170-171.
[11] Pourtalei, F., & Atashak, M. (2009). A model for research and technology institutes budgeting based on science and technology outputs cost. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 3(1), 53-65.
[12] Ashworth, R., Boyne, G., & Delbridge, R. (2007). Escape from the Iron Cage? Organizational Change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector. Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, 19, 165-187. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum026
[13] PEFA (2016). Public Financial Management: Performance Measurement Framework. (June) Washington, DC: PEFA Secretariat, The World Bank.
[14] Njoh, A.J. (2000). The impact of colonial heritage on development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Social Indicators Research, 52(2), 161-178. doi:10.1023/A:1007096010865
[15] Fogarty, T.J., & Dirsmith, M.W. (2001). Organizational socialization as instrument and symbol: An extended institutional theory perspective. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(3), 247-266. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1006
[16] Fitzpatrick, L.A. (2017). Legislative Strength and Democratization in Sub-Saharan Africa. University of California, Davis.
[17] Lienert, M.I. (2010). Role of the legislature in budget processes. International Monetary Fund.
[18] Kristensen, J.K., Bowen, M., Long, C., Mustapha, S., & Zrinski, U. eds. (2019). PEFA, Public Financial Management, and Good Governance. The World Bank.
[19] Stapenhurst, R. (Ed.). (2008). Legislative oversight and budgeting: A world perspective. World Bank Publications
 
Journal of Science and Technology Policy
Volume 16, Issue 4 - Serial Number 60
February 2024
Pages 99-118

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics