peer review process

Review Policy:
This journal employs a thorough and unbiased double-blind review process. Initially, the editor evaluates each submission for its appropriateness for our publication. Papers that meet our criteria are then forwarded to at least two independent experts for a detailed review, focusing on the academic rigor and validity of the work.

The responsibility for the final decision on the acceptance or rejection of a manuscript lies with the editor, and their judgment in this matter is conclusive. To maintain impartiality, editors do not participate in decision-making for submissions where there is a potential conflict of interest. This includes papers they have authored, works by family members or close associates, or papers linked to products or services in which the editor has a personal stake. Submissions falling under these categories are subjected to the same rigorous review process, managed independently from the involved editor's influence.