[1] Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
[2] Brey, P. (2010). Philosophy of technology after the empirical turn. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 14(1), 36-48.
[3] Van de Poel, I. (2009). Values in Engineering Design. In Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (pp. 973-1006).
[4] Van de Poel, I. (2015). Engineering Design Ethics. In C. Mitcham (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science technology and ethics (pp. 622-625).
[5] Van de Poel, I., & Kroes, P. (2014). Can technology embody values? In The moral status of technical artefacts (pp. 103-124). Springer Netherlands.
[6] Winner, L. (1980). Do Artefacts Have Politics? Deadalus, 121-136.
[7] Verbeek, P. P. (2008). Morality in design: Design ethics and the morality of technological artifacts. In Philosophy and design (pp. 91-103). Springer, Dordrecht.
[8] Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn State Press.
[9] Verbeek, P. P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. University of Chicago Press.
[10] Verbeek, P. P. (2006). Materializing Morality: On the morality of technological artifacts and their design. Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(3), 361-380.
[11] Van de Poel, I. (2013). Translating Values into Design Requirements. In Translating Values into Design Requirements (pp. 253-266). Springer Netherlands.
[12] Ihde, D. (2006). The designer fallacy and technological imagination. In Defining Technological Literacy Towards an Epistemological Framework (pp. 121-131).
[13] Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. Routledge.
[14] Brey, P. (2014). From moral agents to moral factors: The structural ethics approach. In The moral status of technical artefacts (pp. 125-142). Springer, Dordrecht.