[1] Bozeman, B., & Fellows, M. (1988). Technology transfer at the US national laboratories: A framework for evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 11(1), 65–75.
[2] Cohen, L. R., & Noll, R. G. (1996). The future of the national laboratories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(23), 12678–12685.
[3] Hallonsten, O., & Heinze, T. (2012). Institutional persistence through gradual organizational adaptation: Analysis of national laboratories in the USA and Germany. Science and Public Policy, 39(4), 450–463.
[4] Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Van Fleet, D. D. (2011). Public science and public innovation: Assessing the relationship between patenting at US National Laboratories and the Bayh-Dole Act. Research Policy, 40(8), 1094–1099.
[5] Siegel, D., Bogers, M. L., Jennings, P. D., & Xue, L. (2023). Technology transfer from national/federal labs and public research institutes: Managerial and policy implications. Research Policy, 52(1), 104646.
[6] Westfall, C. (2008). Introduction to the special issue: Surviving the squeeze: National laboratories in the 1970s and 1980s. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 38(4), 475–478.
[7] Adams, J. D., Chiang, E. P., & Jensen, J. L. (2003). The influence of federal laboratory R&D on industrial research. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1003–1020.
[8] Markusen, A., & Oden, M. (1996). National laboratories as business incubators and region builders. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 21(1), 93–108.
[9] Price, S. E., & Siegel, D. S. (2019). Assessing the role of the federal government in the development of new products, industries, and companies: Case study evidence since World War II. Annals of Science and Technology Policy, 3(4), 348–437.
[10] Anadon, L. D., Chan, G., Bin-Nun, A. Y., & Narayanamurti, V. (2016). The pressing energy innovation challenge of the US National Laboratories. Nature Energy, 1(10), 1–8.
[11] Dezhina, I. (2014). Russia’s Academy of Sciences’ reform: Causes and consequences for Russian science. Russie. Nei. Visions, 77, 1–27.
[12] Jaffe, A. B., & Lerner, J. (2001). Reinventing public R&D: Patent policy and the commercialization of national laboratory technologies. RAND Journal of Economics, 167–198.
[13] Li, X., Yang, K., & Xiao, X. (2016). Scientific advice in China: The changing role of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Palgrave Communications, 2(1), 1–8.
[14] Schmaltz, F., Stahnisch, F. W., & Topp, S. (2023). On the history of neuroscience research in the Max Planck Society, 1948–2002—German, European, and transatlantic perspectives: Introduction. History of Neuroscience, 32, 71–80.
[15] Morone, J., & Ivins, R. (1982). Problems and opportunities in technology transfer from the national laboratories to industry. Research Management, 25(3), 35–44.
[16] Reinovsky, R. E., Schilling, O., Kamm, J., Rousculp, C. L., Shashkov, M. J., & Zocher, M. A. (2013). 20 Years of US/Russian Laboratory Cooperation in Science and Technology 1992–2012 (U).
[17] Yousefi, R. (2022). An overview of the missions and achievements of the national laboratories of the United States. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 12(3), 89–110. {In Persian}
[18] Naderi, D., & Maghsoudi, A. (2018). Scientific Laboratory Network of Iran (SHAA): Facilitating communication between laboratories and researchers. Scientific Journal of Applied and Advanced Research (SHAA), 2(2), 27–33. {In Persian}
[19] Oliaei, M. S., & Rahmani, M. (2007). National development laboratory network (Shamtek thematic). Rahyaft, 17(41), 85–102. {In Persian}
[20] Oliaei, M. S. (2018). New method for organizing Iran’s research laboratories and workshops: Case study of MSRT’s (Ministry of Science, Research and Technology) laboratories and workshops. Scientific Journal of Applied and Advanced Research (SHAA), 2(1), 5–12. {In Persian}
[21] Oliaei, M. S. (2021). Outlook on the history of research laboratories networks in Iran. Science Cultivation, 11(2), 144–154. {In Persian}
[22] Fartash, K., & Sadabadi, A. A. (2019). Institutions and their influence on science and technology development. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 11(2), 239-253. {In Persian}.
[23] Chen, Z., He, Y., & Guo, F. (2025). Ascending the summit: National laboratories as the upgrading path for driving national value chains. Journal of Applied Economics, 28(1), 2469883.
[24] Smith, H. L. (1997). Regulatory change and skill transfer: The case of national laboratories in the UK, France and Belgium. Regional Studies, 31(1), 41–54.
[25] Vice Presidency for Science and Technology and Knowledge-Based Economy (Iran). (2025). Report on the proposed framework for establishing a national laboratory in Iran: Review of national and international experiences in establishing national laboratories. Tehran, Iran. {In Persian}
[26] Jordan, G. B., Streit, L. D., & Binkley, J. S. (2003). Assessing and improving the effectiveness of national research laboratories. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(2), 228–235.
[27] Smith, J. (2000). From R&D to strategic knowledge management: Transitions and challenges for national laboratories. R&D Management, 30(4), 305–311.
[28] George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
[29] Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2018). Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 284–300.
[30] Ghanavati, F. & Mashayekh, J. (2022). Methodological Foundations in Comparative Studies of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in Iran. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 15(2), 93-108. {In Persian}.
[31] Rastgar Agah, M. (2025). Statistical strategies for objectifying theoretical saturation in qualitative studies. Educational Measurement, 16(60), 143–167. {In Persian}
[32] Bloor, M., & Wood, F. (2006). Keywords in qualitative methods: A vocabulary of research concepts. Sage Publications.
[33] Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760.
[34] Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1).
[35] Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
[36] Saee, E. (2020). Research methodology in social sciences with a critical rationality approach. Tehran: SAMT. {In Persian}
[37] Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET). (2024, October). Fueling China’s innovation: The Chinese Academy of Sciences and its role in the PRC’s S&T ecosystem. Georgetown University.
[38] Whicher, A. (2021). Evolution of policy labs and use of design for policy in UK government. Policy Design and Practice, 4(2), 252–270.
)