حکمرانی آموزش عالی دولت‌بنیاد و چالش شکاف میان دانشگاه با صنعت برق در تربیت نیروی انسانی فنی و مهندسی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری برنامه ریزی توسعه آموزش عالی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

2 عضو هیئت علمی گروه حکمرانی آموزش عالی، پژوهشگاه مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی وزارت عتف، تهران، ایران

3 عضو هیئت علمی گروه مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، پژوهشگاه نیرو، تهران، ایران

10.22034/jstp.2026.12032.1923

چکیده

تربیت نیروی انسانی فنی و مهندسی به‌عنوان یکی از ارکان توسعه، مستلزم شکل‌دهی مؤثر به ارتباط میان دانشگاه‌ها و صنایع در حکمرانی آموزش عالی است. این ارتباط در ایران تحت رویکرد حکمرانی دولت‌بنیاد در آموزش عالی به‌وسیله دولت کنترل و فرماندهی می‌شود؛ وضعیتی که موجب ایجاد شکاف میان دانشگاه با صنعت در تربیت بهینه نیروهای انسانی فنی و مهندسی شده است. پدیدارشناسی ادراک و تجارب هفده نفر از نمایندگان کنشگران حکمرانی آموزش عالی (دولت، دانشگاه و صنعت برق) برخوردار از سوابق تجربی یا مطالعاتی برجسته در سیاست‌گذاری و برنامه‌ریزی نیروی انسانی نشان داد که خاستگاه این شکاف به انحصار ایدئولوژی دولتی بر عرضه آموزش عالی و اعمال آن در یک ساختار دیوان‌سالار برمی‌گردد. این ساختار با ایجاد اختلال در ارتباط بهینه و ارگانیک دانشگاه‌ها و صنایع از یک سو موجب شکل‌گیری سیاست‌گذاری جزیره‌ای در این عرصه شده و از سویی زمینه بروز فساد و تعارض منافع در عرضه آموزش عالی را به وجود آورده است. در این شرایط، تربیت نیروی انسانی فنی و مهندسی در یک نظام آموزشی به‌شدت درون‌گرا و منفک از درک و تعامل با واقعیت‌های بیرونی و نیازهای بازار کار انجام‌گرفته و افت کیفیت را به بار آورده است. راه برون‌رفت از این وضعیت، بازتعریف نقش دولت از تصدی‌گری به حمایت و تنظیم‌گری و ایجاد حکمرانی مشارکتی و عقلانی میان دولت، دانشگاه و صنعت در تربیت بهینه نیروی انسانی فنی و مهندسی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

State-Centric Higher Education Governance and the Challenge of the University-Power Industry Gap in Developing Technical and Engineering Human Capital

نویسندگان [English]

  • Armita ghorban shiroodi 1
  • hamed kamali 2
  • Ashraf Sadat Pasandideh 3
1 PhD in Higher Education Development Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Higher Education Governance, Institute for Social and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Management and Social Science Department, Niroo Research Institute, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The development of technical and engineering human capital, as a cornerstone of development, necessitates an effective relationship between universities and industries within the framework of higher education governance. In Iran, this relationship is controlled and commanded by the state under a state-centric governance approach, a situation that has created a gap between universities and the industry in the optimal development of technical and engineering human capital. A phenomenological study of the perceptions and experiences of seventeen representatives from key governance stakeholders (government, university, and the power industry), all with distinguished backgrounds in human capital policymaking and planning, revealed that the origin of this gap stems from the monopoly of state ideology over the provision of higher education, implemented through a bureaucratic structure. This structure, by disrupting an optimal and organic relationship between universities and industries, has led to siloed policymaking on one hand, and has created opportunities for corruption and conflicts of interest on the other. Under these conditions, the development of technical and engineering human capital is conducted within a highly inward-looking educational system, detached from understanding and engaging with external realities and labor market needs, which has resulted in a decline in quality. The solution to this situation lies in redefining the state’s role from one of direct management (proprietorship) to one of support and regulation, and establishing a participatory and rational governance model among the state, university, and industry for the optimal development of technical and engineering human capital.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Higher Education and Development
  • Higher Education Governance
  • Engineering Education
  • Human Capital Development
  • Power Industry
[1] Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends In Global Higher Education: Tracking An Academic Revolution. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-40615-5.
[2] Kraak, A. (Ed.). (2000). Changing Modes: New Knowledge Production And Its Implications For Higher Education In South Africa. HSRC Press.
[3] Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical And Empirical Analysis, With Special Reference To Education (3rd ed.). University Of Chicago Press.
[4] Jones, C. (2013). Jones, C., & Vollrath, D. (2013).INTRODUCTION TO ECONOMIC GROWTH 3rd ed.
[5] Craven, A. (2011). Social justice and higher education. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 16(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2011.611831
[6] Teichler, U., & Yağcı, Y. (2009). Changing Challenges Of Academic Work: Concepts And Observations. In Higher Education, Research And Innovation: Changing Dynamics (pp. 83–146). UNESCO.
[7] Trow, M. (2007). Reflections On The Transition From Elite To Mass To Universal Access: Forms And Phases Of Higher Education In Modern Societies Since WWII. In J. J. F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International Handbook Of Higher Education (pp. 243–280). Springer.
[8] Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends In Global Higher Education: Tracking An Academic Revolution. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-40615-5.
[9] Marginson, S. (2016). The Worldwide Trend To High Participation Higher Education: Dynamics Of Social Stratification In Inclusive Systems. Higher Education, 72(8), 413–428.
[10] World Bank. (2020). The Human Capital Index 2020 Update: Human Capital In The Time Of COVID-19. World Bank.
[11] World Bank Group. (2019). Infrastructure and Poverty Reduction: Innovative Policies for Effective Access. https://www.worldbank.org
[12] International Labour Organization. (2022). Employment And Skills Strategies In Developing Countries. International Labour Organization.
[13] Tarverdi, Y., Saha, S., & Campbell, N. (2019). Governance, Democracy And Development. Economic Analysis And Policy, 63, 220–233.
[14] Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization And Governance Of Universities. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477–493.
[15] Fathollahi, A., Yamani, M., Farasatkhah, M., & Ghasi Tabatabaei, M. (2015). Content Analysis Of Higher Education Programs With A Focus On Structural And Functional Changes Of Academic Autonomy. Journal Of Science And Technology Policy, 8(1), 27–47. {In Persian}.
20.1001.1.20080840.1394.8.1.3.8
[16] Austin, I., & Jones, G. A. (2016). Governance Of Higher Education: Global Perspectives, Theories, And Practices. Routledge.
[17] OECD. (2021). Innovations in education and skills. OECD Publishing.
[18] Marginson, S. (2016). The Worldwide Trend To High Participation Higher Education: Dynamics Of Social Stratification In Inclusive Systems. Higher Education, 72(4), 413–428.
[19] Hénard, F., & Mitterle, A. (2019). Governance And Quality Guidelines In Higher Education. OECD Publishing.
[20] Islam Council Research Center. (1994; 2000; 2017). Laws Of The Economic, Social And Cultural Development Plans Of The Islamic Republic Of Iran (Second, Third, And Sixth Plans). Islam Council Research Center. {In Persian}.
[21] Maralani, P. (2008). Examining The Significant Decline In Engineering Applicants. Iranian Journal Of Engineering Education, 22, 137–143. {In Persian}.
10.22047/ijee.2021.263013.1803
[22] Feyz, J. (2023). Challenges Of Higher Education In Engineering Fields. Iranian Journal Of Engineering Education, 25(100), 129–143. {In Persian}.
[23] Nikounejad, S., Ghaderi, M., Azizi, N., & Nistani, M. R. (2020). Analyzing University–Industry Communication Policies In Iran: Presenting A New Model. Journal Of Educational Planning Studies, 9(18), 115–150. {In Persian}.
10.22080/eps.2021.19597.1958
[24] Mohammadi, R., Khodaei, E., & Eshaghi, F. (2023). Quantitative Trend Of Engineering Education Expansion In Iran And Challenges In Improving Its Quality. Iranian Journal Of Engineering Education, 25(Special Issue – Winter 2023), 105–128. {In Persian}.
[25] Hosseini, H. (2020). Challenges Of Employment And Entrepreneurship For Electrical Graduates In Qazvin Province. Master’s thesis, University Of Zanjan. {In Persian}.
[26] Badamchi, M. H., & Ghaem Khani, M. (2015). The Crisis Of Technicism In Iranian Higher Education: Sociology Of Elite Migration From Engineering Fields To Humanities. Journal Of Epistemological Studies In Islamic University, 19(3), 336–357. [In Persian]
[27] Mehr Alizadeh, Y., & Armen, A. (2007). Examining The Job Market Of Undergraduate Graduates In Iranian Public Universities. Daneshvar Raftar, 26(14), 73–86. {In Persian}.
[28] Hosseinzadeh, A. H., Rezadoust, B., Arabi, A., & Bandari Mehran. (2025). The Vicious Cycle Of Industry–University Relations: Strategies For Achieving Knowledge Capitalization. Journal Of Strategic Research On Social Issues, 14(2), 67–88. {In Persian}.. 10.22108/srspi.2025.143294.2048
[29] Karnokar, M., Nikpay, I., & Madandar Arani, A. (2022). Identifying And Prioritizing Challenges Affecting University–Industry Participation And Providing Solutions (Case Study: Khorramabad). Journal Of Strategic Management And Futures Studies, 5(2), 103–127. {In Persian}.
[30] Ghaffari, H., et al. (2019). Gap Between University And Industry: Challenges In Human Resource Training. Journal Of Industrial Research, 8(2), 23–38. {In Persian}.
10.22108/srspi.2025.143294.2048
[31] Clark, B. R. (1983). The Higher Education System: Academic Organization In Cross-National Perspective. University Of California Press.
[32] Olsen, J. P. (2007). The Institutional Dynamics Of The European University. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University Dynamics And European Integration (pp. 25–54). Springer.
[33] Teichler, U. (2015). Academic Staff And The Relevance Of Higher Education: Challenges In A Changing World. Higher Education Policy, 28(3), 321–340.
[34] Powell, L., & McGrath, S. (2022). Skills For Human Development: Transforming Vocational Education And Training. Routledge.
[35] Entezari, Y. (2015). Microeconomics Of Higher Education. Institute For Research And Planning In Higher Education. {In Persian}.
[36] Hemmati, R. (2011). Sociological Study Of Science–Society Relations (Case Study: Basic And Technical Sciences At University Of Isfahan). PhD thesis, University Of Isfahan. {In Persian}.
[37] Williams, P. J. (2007). Valid Knowledge: The Economy And The Academy. Higher Education, 54, 511–523.
[38] Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry And Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
[39] Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool For Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405.
[40] Hanushek, E. A. (2005). The Economics Of School Quality. Public Finance Review, 33(3), 285–311.