[1] Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
[2] Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37, 596-615.
[3] Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the Nature, Function, and Composition of Technological systems, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1, 93-118.
[4] Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmen, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31(2), 233-245.
[5] Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, I. (2014). Why space matters in technological innovation systems—Mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology. Research Policy, 43, 138-155.
[6] Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analyzing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 413-432.
[7] Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Actor-oriented analysis of innovation systems: exploring micro-meso level linkages in the case of stationary fuel cells. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(4), 433-464.
[8] Wieczorek, A., & Hekkert, M. P. (2012). Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Sci. Public Policy, 39(1), 74-87.
[9] North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, New York.
[10] Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37, 407-429.
[11] Hekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2009). Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Emperical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, 584-594.
[12] Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., & Sanden, B. (2009). Legitimation’and ‘development of positive externalities: two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 575-592.
[13] Bening, C., Blum, N., & Schmidt, T. (2015). The need to increase the policy relevance of the functional approach to Technological Innovation Systems. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 73-75.
[14] Bergek, A., & Jacobsson, S. (2004). Transforming the Energy Sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 815-849.
[15] Miremadi, I., Saboohi, Y., & Jacobsson, S. (2018). Assessing the performance of energy innovation system: Towards an established set of indicators. Energy Research & Social Science, 40, 159-176.
[16] Gosens, J., & Lu, Y. (2013). From lagging to leading? Technological innovation systems in emerging economies and the case of Chinese wind power. Energy Policy, 60, 234-250.
[17] Jacobsson, S., & Johnson, A. (2000). The Diffusion of Renewable Energy Technology: An Analytical Framework and Key Issues for Research. Energy Policy, 28, 625-640.
[18] Suurs, R. A. A. (2009). Motors of sustainable innovation. Towards a theory on the dynamics of technological innovation systems (Thesis). Utrecht University, Utrecht.
[19] Suurs, R. A. A., & Hekkert, M. P. (2009). Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(8), 1003-1020.
[20] Hekkert, M., Negro, S., Heimeriks, G., & Harmsen, R. (2011). Technological innovation system analysis: A manual for analysts. Utrecht University.
[21] Kern, F. (2015). Engaging with the politics, agency and structures in the technological innovation systems approach. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 67-69.
[22] Alco Kieft, A., Harmsen, R., & Hekkert, M. (2018). Toward ranking interventions for Technological Innovation Systems via the concept of Leverage Points. Technological forecasting and social change. Doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.021
[23] Walrave, B., & Raven, R. (2016). Modelling the dynamics of technological innovation systems. Research Policy, 45, 1833-1844.
[24] Holmen, M., & Jacobsson, S. (2000). A method for identifying actors in a knowledge based cluster. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9, 331-351.
[25] Bening, C., Blum, N., & Schmidt, T. (2015). The need to increase the policy relevance of the functional approach to Technological Innovation Systems. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 73-75.
[26] Bergek, A., & Jacobsson, S. (2003). The emergence of a growth industry: a comparative analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish wind turbine industries. In: Metcalfe, S., & Cantner, U. (Eds.), Change, Transformation and Development. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 197-227.
[27] Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., & Jacobsson, S. (2008). Functions in innovation systems: A framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying goals for system-building activities by entrepreneurs and policy makers. RIDE/IMIT Working Paper No. 84426-008.
[28] Dodgson, M., Hughes, A., & Metcalfe, S. (2011). Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: The case of Australial. Research Policy, 40, 1145-1156.
[29] Smits, R., & Kuhlmann, S. (2004). The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and innovation policy, 1(1), 4-32.
[30] Reichard, K., Negro, S., & Hekkert, M. (2016). Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: The case of offshore wind in Germany. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 106, 11-21.
[31] Truffer, B. (2015). Challenges for Technological Innovation Systems research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 65-66.
[32] Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2015). Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 51-64.
[33] Sanden, B. A., & Hillman, K. M. (2011). A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden. Research Policy, 40, 403-414.
[34] Jacobsson, S., & Lauber, V. (2006). The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy, 34, 256-276.
[35] Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31, 247-264.
[36] Dewald, U., & Truffer, B. (2012). The local sources of market formation: explaining regional growth differentials in german photovoltaic markets. European Planning Studies, 20, 397-420.
[37] Freeman, C., & Louca, F. (2001). As time goes by: From the industrial revolutions to the information revolutions. Oxford University Press.
[38] Markard, J. (2018). The life cycle of technological innovation systems. Technological forecasting and social change. Doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.045
[39] Peltoniemi, M. (2011). Reviewing industry life-cycle theory: avenues for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 349-375.
[40] Taylor, M., & Taylor, A. (2012). The technology life cycle: conceptualization and managerial implications. International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 541-553.
[41] Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2019). Transformative change: What role for science, technology and innovation policy?. Research Policy, 48, 843-848.
[42] RahimiRad, Z., YahyazadeFar, M., & Miremadi, T. (2018). Analysis of Photovoltaic Solar System Technological Innovation System in Iran. Innovation Management Journal, 6(4), 1-28. {In Persian}.
[43] Dehghan, N., Miremadi, T., & Ramezanpour, G. (2019). The Assessment of International Sanctions on Photovoltaic Innovation System of Iran. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 10(4), 63-77. {In Persian}.
[44] Mousavi, M., GhaneiRad, M., & Karimian, H. (2018). Presenting a Framework for Describing the Technological Transitions Based on the Multilevel Analysis Approach-Case Study: The Transition to Renewable Energy in Iran. Journal of Improvement Management, 12(2), 141-176. {In Persian}.
[45] Hanson, J. (2018). Established industries as foundations for emerging technological innovation systems: The case of solar photovoltaics in Norway. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 64-77.
[46] Miremadi, I., Saboohi, Y., & Khajepor, H. (2019). Development of a Comprehensive Framework to Analyse Systems of Energy and Environmental Innovation. Journal of Improvement Management, 12(4), 73-98. {In Persian}.
)
