تحلیل همگرایی سناریوهای آینده فناوری اطلاعات

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری سیاستگذاری علم‌وفنّاوری، دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس، تهران، ایران.

2 استاد مهندسی فنّاوری‌اطلاعات، دانشگاه تربیت‌مدرس، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف از تحقیق حاضر، مطالعه، دسته‌‌بندی و تحلیل سناریوهای مختلف آینده فنّاوری‌‌اطلاعات و درک ارتباط میان این سناریوهاست. روش­تحقیق، عبارت است از  مرور پیشینه پژوهش از نوع فراترکیب و مقایسه بین سناریوهای آینده فنّاوری‌‌اطلاعات. تحلیل سناریوهای آینده فنّاوری‌‌اطلاعات نشان‌‌می‌‌دهد این سناریوها هرچند متأثر از تحوّلات اجتماعی و روند رشد فنّاوری‌‌های پردازشی و ارتباطاتی است اما تأثیر عمیقی بر تحوّلات اجتماعی دارد. از دیدگاه تأثیر فنّاوری‌‌اطلاعات بر تحوّلات اجتماعی، این سناریوها از سه منظر متفاوت، شامل «مردم»، «دولت» و «الگوهای توسعه»  ترسیم‌‌می‌‌شوند. این سه منظر، در سه دستگاه مختصات متفاوت با محورهای عدم‌‌قطعیتی که در وهله اول متفاوت به نظر‌‌می‌‌رسند، به توصیف سبک زندگی مردم، حکمرانی دولت و مسیر توسعه کشورها می‌‌پردازند. از کاوش متن سناریوها، فهرستی از ویژگی‌‌ها و آثار تحقق آنها به دست می‌‌آید. یافته‌‌ها حکایت از اشتراک در ابعاد عدم­قطعیت سه منظر یادشده دارد که منجر به تشکیل چارچوبی واحد از طریق انطباق تقریبی دستگاه‌‌های مختصات می‌‌شود. از مقایسه سناریوهای واقع در هر ربع این دستگاه مختصات واحد، نتیجه­می‌‌شود که به‌‌رغم تفاوت در بازیگران و نقش­آفرینان اصلی، این سناریوها، همپوشانی جدّی در ابعاد و تجسّم وضعیت مطلوب دارند  و نوعی همگرایی مفهومی در آثار آنها مشاهده‌‌می‌‌شود. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analyzing the Convergence of the Information Technology Future Scenarios

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amir Khodadadi 1
  • Gholam Ali Montazer 2
1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Information Technology Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor of Information Technology, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Reviewing The literature of the Information Technology (IT) future scenarios, four categories of research can be identified: one category is the researches that have studied the change in "people's lifestyle and work" due to the development of Information Technology, the second group has studied "governance changes" under the influence of IT, and the third category deals about the "impact of Information Technology on development". Unlike these three categories, some researches have studied the future of Information Technology affected by social changes. This article, studies and describes different IT future scenarios, and then groups and analyzes them in order to help understand the relationship between them. The research method is a kind of review called meta-analysis (qualitative systematic review) and comparison between IT future scenarios. Analysis of these scenarios shows that although they are influenced by social changes and impressed by the growth of the computational and communication technologies, they affect the social changes as well. From the view of social changes affected by IT, these scenarios are drawn from three points of view including "People", "Government" and "Development Models". These three points of view depict the lifestyles of the people, governance and countries' development path. Probing the scenarios, we found a list of characteristics and impacts of the scenarios. Findings show there is a unity between the uncertainties of the above-mentioned three points of view which leads to building a unit framework through the conformity of the coordinate devices. Comparison of the scenarios in each quarter of this unit coordinate device infers that despite the different actors, the ideal scenarios do coincide seriously in the dimensions and the ideal situation, so that there is a kind of conceptual convergence in their effects.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Scenario Planning
  • Information Technology
  • Trends
  • Uncertainty Dimensions
  • Scenarios' Convergence
[1] UNIDO, 2023, Retrieved: https://www.unido.org/our-focus/advancing-economic-competitiveness/investing-technology-and-innovation/competitiveness-business-environment-and-upgrading/technology-foresight
[2] UNIDO, 2005, “UNIDO Technology Foresight Manual: Technology foresight in Action. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
[3] Sokolov, A., & Chulok, A. (2016). Priorities for future innovation: Russian S&T Foresight 2030. Futures80, 17-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.12.005
[4] Corallo, A., Lazoi, M., De Marco, G., Greco, N. C., Manna, M., & Pascarelli, C. (2014, June). A foresight strategy proposal for ICT scenarios definitions: An application for PLM tools and systems. In 2014 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE) (pp. 1-10). IEEE. DOI:10.1109/ICE.2014.6871548
[5] Ghazinoory, S., & Ghazinoori, S. (2017). An introduction to science, technology, and innovation policy. Tarbiat Modares University publication. {In Persian}.
[6] Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B., 2020, The Network Readiness Index, 2020, "Accelerating Digital Transformation in a post-COVID Global Economy", Portulans Institute, ISBN: 978-1-63649-055-7
[7] Ichiguchi, T., & Yokoo, Y. (2009). Regional Foresight Scenarios in Germany-IT and the Media in Baden-W-rttemberg in 2020. NISTEP Science & Technology Foresight Center.
[8] Kostakis, V., Bauwens, M., & Niaros, V. (2015). Urban reconfiguration after the emergence of peer-to-peer infrastructure: Four future scenarios with an impact on smart cities. In Smart cities as democratic ecologies (pp.116-124). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[9] Keeler, L. W., & Bernstein, M. J. (2021). The future of aging in smart environments: Four scenarios of the United States in 2050. Futures133,102830.
[10] Eysin, U., 2020, Scenario Report NGI-The Internet for People 2040, BMK Abt. III/I5-Schlusseltechnologien fur industrielle Innovation:IKT, Produktion und Nanotechnologien, English, 74 pages
[11] Lavikka, R., Kallio, J., Casey, T., & Airaksinen, M. (2018). Digital disruption of the AEC industry: Technology-oriented scenarios for possible future development paths. Construction management and economics,36(11),635-650.
[12] Certomà,C.(2022). Future scenarios of Digital Social Innovation in urban governance. A collective discussion on the socio-political implications in Ghent.Cities,122,103542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103542.
[13] Misuraca, G., Broster, D., & Centeno, C. (2012). Digital Europe 2030: Designing scenarios for ICT in future governance and policy makingGovernment Information Quarterly,29, S121-S131.
[14] Ehlers, M. H., Finger, R., El Benni, N., Gocht, A., Sørensen, C. A. G., Gusset, M., ... & Huber, R. (2022). Scenarios for European agricultural policymaking in the era of digitalisation. Agricultural Systems196, 103318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103318.
[15] Shahsavari, A., Alamolhoda, J., 2019, Methodology of Research Reviews and its Role in Knowledge Production: Developing a Typology, Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol.25, No. 98 ISSN:1608-7070{In Persian}
[16] Bench, S., & Day, T. (2010). The user experience of critical care discharge: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. International journal of nursing studies47(4),487-499.
[17] Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. springer publishing company.
[18] EC–European Commission. (2016). Digital futures: Final report. A journey into 2050 visions and policy challenges.
[19] Pernestål, A., Engholm, A., Bemler, M., & Gidofalvi, G. (2020). How will digitalization change road freight transport? Scenarios tested in Sweden. Sustainability,13(1), 304.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010304
[20] Pollitzer, E., 2018; Creating a Better Future: Four scenarios for how Digital Technologies could change the world; Journal of International Affairs Vol.72,No.1