Technological System Analysis by Emphasizing the Role of Contextual Factors; Case Study: Underground Gas Storage Technology

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Science and Technology Policy, National Research Institute for Science Policy, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, National Research Institute for Science Policy, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Amirkabir University, Tehran, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

5 Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Allameh Tabatabaie University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

TDue to the increasing significance of natural gas in the global energy portfolio and also Iran being the holder of second most natural gas reserves in the world the importance of managing the production and consumption of natural gas is an apparent fact Therefore underground gas storage USG technology as a tool of gas reservoir management could play a considerable role in the future of the gas industry in Iran Nevertheless the growing trend of attaining key technologies in this field has experienced a standstill In order to analyze and plan the development of this technology there is a need to discover the roots of the problems and failures which hinder this development and also to analyze them This paper aims to provide a framework for analyzing such problems using the approach of technological innovation systems Furthermore the effect of contextual and environmental factors on the development of this technology has been discussed Finally using the structural equation modelling method the relationship between contextual structural and functional factors of the technological innovation system of USG has been tested In the end it is determined that contextual factors directly and also indirectly affect the performance of the mentioned system by influencing structural factors to the extent that the intensity of effects on functions caused by contextual factors is greater than that of structural problems

References

 [1] Colton, W. M. (2011). The Outlook for Energy: A View to 2040. Exxon Mobil Corporation. Available from: http://corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/energy/energy-outlook/highlights/.
[2] Duddu, P. (2013). The world’s biggest natural gas reserves. Available from: http://www.hydrocarbons-technology.com/features/feature-the-worlds-biggest-natural-gas-reserves/.
[3] Kouchaki, E. (2011). An Introsuction to Underground Gas Storage Projects in Iran. In The first Iranian Virtual Conference on Underground Storage of Hydrocarbons, Shahrood University of Technology, Semnan, Iran. {In Persian}.
[4] Jacobsson, S., & Bergek, A. (2011). Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 41-57.
[5] Wieczorek, A. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2012). Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Science and Public Policy, 39(1), 74-87.
[6] Wieczorek, A. J., Hekkert, M. P., Coenen, L., & Harmsen, R. (2015). Broadening the national focus in technological innovation system analysis: The case of offshore wind. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 14, 128-148.
[7] Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., Sandén, B., & Truffer, B. (2015). Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 51-64.
[8] Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National innovation system: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, London.
[9] Jacobsson, S., & Johnson, A. (2000). The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research. Energy policy, 28(9), 625-640.
[10] Malerba, F. (Ed.). (2004). Sectoral systems of innovation: concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
[11] Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological forecasting and social change, 74(4), 413-432.
[12] Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research policy, 37(3), 407-429.
[13] Hellsmark, H. (2010). Unfolding the formative phase of gasified biomass in the European Union: The role of system builders in realising the potential of second-generation transportation fuels from biomass. Chalmers University of Technology.
[14] Sabatier, P. A. (2006). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach (theoretical lenses on public policy).
[15] Smits, R., & Kuhlmann, S. (2004). The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International journal of foresight and innovation policy, 1(1-2), 4-32.
[16] Heirani, H., Ghodsipour, H., Bagheri Moghadam, N., & Karimian, H. (2015). Dynamic Functional-Structural Analysis of Technology Development in Innovation System Framework. Case Study: Co-Production of Heat and Power. Journal of Technology Development Management, 2(2), 49-80.{In Persian}.
[17] Wieczorek, A. J., Negro, S. O., Harmsen, R., Heimeriks, G. J., Luo, L., & Hekkert, M. P. (2013). A review of the European offshore wind innovation system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26, 294-306.
[16] Negro, S. O., & Hekkert, M. P. (2008). Explaining the success of emerging technologies by innovation system functioning: the case of biomass digestion in Germany. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(4), 465-482.
[17] Negro, S. O., Hekkert, M. P., & Smits, R. E. (2007). Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion—a functional analysis. Energy policy, 35(2), 925-938.
[18] Lamprinopoulou, C., Renwick, A., Klerkx, L., Hermans, F., & Roep, D. (2014). Application of an integrated systemic framework for analysing agricultural innovation systems and informing innovation policies: Comparing the Dutch and Scottish agrifood sectors. Agricultural Systems, 129, 40-54.
[19] Kebebe, E., Duncan, A. J., Klerkx, L., De Boer, I. J. M., & Oosting, S. J. (2015). Understanding socio-economic and policy constraints to dairy development in Ethiopia: A coupled functional-structural innovation systems analysis. Agricultural Systems, 141, 69-78.
[20] Miremadi, T. & Rahimi rad, Z. (2016). Identification of System Failures in Biofuels Technological Innovation System of Iran. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 8(1), 27-41. {In Persian}.
[21] Safdari Ranjbar, M., Rahmanseresht, H., Manteghi, M., & Ghazinoori, S. (2017). Sectoral Innovation System of a Complex Product System Industry: Gas Turbine. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 9(4), 55-70. {In Persian}.
[22] Nilforoushan, H. & Arasti, M.R. (2014). The Weak Failure Process of Engineered Innovation Networks in the Initiation Phase: The Case Study of Gas Industry in Iran. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 6(2), 77-92. {In Persian}.
[23] Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. Research policy, 35(1), 56-67.
[24] OECD. (1997). Local systems of small firms and job creation.
[25] Woolthuis, R. K., Lankhuizen, M. & Gilsing, V. (2005). A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 25(6), 609-619.
[26] Chaminade, C. & Edquist, C. (2010). Rationales for public policy intervention in the innovation process: A systems of innovation approach, The theory and practice of innovation policy. An international research handbook, 95-114.
[27] Weber, K. M. & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037-1047.
[28] Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Research policy, 31(2), 233-245.
[29] Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Actor-oriented analysis of innovation systems: exploring micro–meso level linkages in the case of stationary fuel cells. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(4), 443-464.
[30] Truffer, B., Rohracher, H., & Markard, J. (2009). The Analysis of Institutions in Technological Innovation Systems-A conceptual framework applied to biogas development in Austria. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, 7.
[31] Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40(3), 414-433.
[32] Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Sage.
[33] Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
[34] Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS quarterly, 177-195.
 
 
Journal of Science and Technology Policy
Volume 11, Issue 1
April 2018
Pages 2-17

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics