<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Iranian Association for Management of Technology</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Science and Technology Policy</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>20080840</Issn>
				<Volume>18</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Intermediaries between Knowledge and Business Ecosystems:
    A Typology</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Intermediaries between Knowledge and Business Ecosystems:
    A Typology</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>19</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>36</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">14099</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/jstp.2025.11822.1839</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Effat</FirstName>
					<LastName>Norouzi</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD Student on Management of Technology, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Soroush</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghazinoori</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abolfazl</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bagheri</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP),Iran,Tehran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>08</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>‏ The interaction between knowledge flows and business flows in various linear, process-based, networked, and systemic approaches has always been a matter of interest. At the ecosystem level, the operational logic of manmade ecosystems, which have different core flows (in this case, the two core flows of knowledge and business), also differs. In other words, the focus of activities in the knowledge ecosystem is knowledge creation, while in the business ecosystem, it is value creation. This distinction poses a significant challenge to establishing effective communication between the two ecosystems. By considering intermediaries as the connecting mechanisms between the flows of these two ecosystems, this article aims to develop a typology of ecosystem intermediaries based on the structural or affiliated ecosystems of knowledge and business. Utilizing typology development through the analysis of ideal types, four types of ecosystem intermediaries have been identified: &quot;Value Driver,&quot; &quot;Complementary Asset Orchestrator,&quot; &quot;Value Accelerator,&quot; and &quot;Network Orchestrator.&quot; Each of these types performs four categories of intermediary functions—organizing networks and systems, facilitating access to complementary assets, creating a learning platform and accelerating, and facilitating market access—with distinct goals and methods. The qualitative data required for developing the typology were collected through a literature review and case studies of ideal types, and the typology was validated by expert confirmation. This typology provides a novel explanation of intermediaries at the ecosystem level</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">‏ The interaction between knowledge flows and business flows in various linear, process-based, networked, and systemic approaches has always been a matter of interest. At the ecosystem level, the operational logic of manmade ecosystems, which have different core flows (in this case, the two core flows of knowledge and business), also differs. In other words, the focus of activities in the knowledge ecosystem is knowledge creation, while in the business ecosystem, it is value creation. This distinction poses a significant challenge to establishing effective communication between the two ecosystems. By considering intermediaries as the connecting mechanisms between the flows of these two ecosystems, this article aims to develop a typology of ecosystem intermediaries based on the structural or affiliated ecosystems of knowledge and business. Utilizing typology development through the analysis of ideal types, four types of ecosystem intermediaries have been identified: &quot;Value Driver,&quot; &quot;Complementary Asset Orchestrator,&quot; &quot;Value Accelerator,&quot; and &quot;Network Orchestrator.&quot; Each of these types performs four categories of intermediary functions—organizing networks and systems, facilitating access to complementary assets, creating a learning platform and accelerating, and facilitating market access—with distinct goals and methods. The qualitative data required for developing the typology were collected through a literature review and case studies of ideal types, and the typology was validated by expert confirmation. This typology provides a novel explanation of intermediaries at the ecosystem level</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">ecosystem intermediaries</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">affiliated ecosystem</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">structural ecosystem</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Typology</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_14099_a5987ac5e523e1b2ca3b7e70dd2754aa.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
