<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Iranian Association for Management of Technology</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Science and Technology Policy</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>20080840</Issn>
				<Volume>5</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>What is the Continental Philosophy of Science?</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>What is the Continental Philosophy of Science?</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>33</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>45</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">12870</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Alizadeh Mamaghani</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This essay aims to introduce and compare two main approaches in philosophy of science. The first approach, which claims to be the main philosophy of science is still the main stream view of the analytic philosophy of science. However the continental approach to philosophy of science has moved in parallel fashion with analytic philosophy, however, in a completely different framework and often in contradiction to the former. In this study, while presenting general definition of continental philosophy of science, which is somehow new expression in this domain analytic and continental approaches will be compared.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This essay aims to introduce and compare two main approaches in philosophy of science. The first approach, which claims to be the main philosophy of science is still the main stream view of the analytic philosophy of science. However the continental approach to philosophy of science has moved in parallel fashion with analytic philosophy, however, in a completely different framework and often in contradiction to the former. In this study, while presenting general definition of continental philosophy of science, which is somehow new expression in this domain analytic and continental approaches will be compared.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Analytic Philosophy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Continental Philosophy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Contextuality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Non-Logicism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Philosophical Science</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Descriptive Approache</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Elite Experssion</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12870_d1a39cb4ad30196f7b3beceb34960dcc.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
