عوامل موثر بر ظرفیت‌‌سازی انتقال فناوری از دانشگاه به صنعت؛ مطالعه موردی ناحیه نوآوری شریف

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته دکتری مدیریت فناوری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران

2 عضو هیأت علمی پژوهشکده مطالعات فناوری، تهران

10.22034/jstp.2021.14.3.1331

چکیده

موفقیت فرآیند انتقال فناوری از دانشگاه به صنعت، نیازمند نهادهایی در درون و حاشیه دانشگاه‌هاست. از طرفی مفهوم ظرفیت‌سازی انتقال فناوری به معنای توانمند کردن هرچه بیشتر این نهادها و همسویی آنها با سایر عوامل اثرگذار بر انتقال فناوری است. از این رو شناسایی عوامل موثر بر موفقیت این نهادها و تقویت آنها یکی از اهداف پژوهش حاضر بوده است. در این تحقیق که یک مطالعه کیفی و با استراتژی مطالعه موردی است تلاش شده عوامل تاثیرگذار در راستای ظرفیت‌‌سازی انتقال فناوری از دانشگاه به صنعت با تمرکز بر ناحیه نوآوری شریف (به عنوان مورد مطالعه) تعیین گردد. ابزار جمع‌آوری داده‌ها، مصاحبه‌ و بررسی اسناد و مدارک موجود بوده است. به‌منظور گردآوری اطلاعات، با به‌کارگیری روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند، خبرگان مطلع مورد مصاحبه عمیق قرار گرفتند. تجزیه ‌و تحلیل داده‌ها به روش تحلیل موضوع (تِم) و با نرم‌افزار MAXQDA انجام گرفت و شبکه مضامینی از عوامل موثر بر ظرفیت‌سازی انتقال فناوری شکل گرفت. براساس نتایج این پژوهش، ظرفیت‌‌سازی انتقال فناوری از دانشگاه به صنعت دارای پنج مقوله اصلی مشتمل بر؛ سیاست دانشگاه، مشارکت پژوهشگر، همراهی صنعت، عوامل سازمانی نهادهای پشتیبان و نهاد سیاست‌گذار می‌باشد. به عبارتی موفقیت انتقال فناوری مرهون وجود یکپارچگی و شفافیت نقش این نهادها و شناخت دقیق معیارهای اثرگذاری هرکدام می باشد. 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Factors Affecting Capacity Building for Technology Transfer From University to Industry; The Case of Sharif Innovation District

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Nozari 1
  • Reza Asadifard 2
1 Ph.D. of Tecgnology Management, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Technology Studies Institute (TSI), Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The success of the technology transfer process from university requires institutions within and around universities. The concept of capacity building for technology transfer means empowering these institutions as much as possible to interact with other actors to commercialize academic technologies and bring them to market. Therefore, identifying the factors affecting the success of these institutions and strengthening them is one of the goals of the present study. In this research, which is a qualitative study with a case study strategy, we try to determine the influential factors in the capacity building of technology transfer with a focus on the Sharif innovation ecosystem. To collect information, using the targeted sampling method, knowledgeable experts in various institutions related to technology transfer in the Sharif Innovation Area were interviewed. Data analysis was performed by the theme analysis method. Based on the results of this study, the capacity-building framework for technology transfer from university has five main categories, including; The university Policy, the participation researcher, Industry accompaniment, organizational factors of mediators, and Policy-making body. In other words, the success of technology transfer is due to the integrity and transparency of the role of these institutions and accurate knowledge of the criteria of each.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • echnology Transfer
  • Capacity Building
  • Commercialization
  • Innovation Ecosystem
  • Sharif University
[1] Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U., & Woerter, M. (2008) University-Industry knowledge and technology transfer in switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises. Research Policy, 37(10), 1365-1883.
[2] Bulut, H., & Moschini, G. (2009).  US Universities Net Return from Patenting and Licensing: Quantile Regression Analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(2), 123-137.
[3] Granieri, M., & Basso, A. (2019) Capacity Building in Technology Transfer. Springer.
[4] Maicher, L., Mjos, K. D., & Tonisson, L. (2019) Tonisson, Intervention Opportunities for Capacity Building in Technology Transfer.  Springer, 29-46.
[5] Harman, G., & Stone, C. (2006) Australian university technology transfer managers: Backgrounds, work roles, specialist skills and perceptions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(3), 213-230.
[6] Link, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2005) Generating Science-Based Growth: An Econometric Analysis of the Impact of Organizational Incentives on University–Industry Technology Transfer. The European Journal of Finance, 11(3), 169-181.
[7] Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U., & Woerter, M. (2008), University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises. Research Policy, 37(10), 1865-1883.
[8] Carlsson, B., & Fridh, A. (2002) Technology transfer in United States universities. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(1), 199-232.
[9] Sharif, N., & Baark, E. (2008). Mobilizing technology transfer from university to industry The experience of Hong Kong universities:  The experience of Hong Kong universities. Journal of Technology Management in China, 3(1), 47-65.
[10] Amin naseri, M., & Zanganeh, S. (2008). study of the role of organizational capabilities on effectiveness of technology transfer in Iranian firms. International Journal of Engineering, University of Science and Industry, 19(1), 1-14. {In Persian}
[11] Jafar, A., Akbari, M., & Davari, A. (2020). The Effective Factors on the Formation of Innovation Clusters: The Case of Sharif Innovation District. Journal of Sciene and Technology Policy, 12(1), 1-14. {In Persian}
[12] Amin Mozaffari, F., & Shamsi, L. (2011). Evaluation of Procedures and Methods of University Researches Commercialization; The Case of Tabriz University. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 3(4), 15-29. {In Persian}
[13] Safdari Ranjbar, M., Aminlo, M., Yaghoubi, M., Alizadeh, A., & Elyasi, M. (2020). University Technology Transfer Offices: Rationalities, Objectives, Challenges and Functions (Case Study: Technology Transfer Office of Tehran University of Medical Science). Journal of technology development management, 8(1), 153-184. {In Persian}
[14] Alinaghizadeh, F. (2019). sharif Nopa (Note: sharif nopa means toddler sharif), sharif university.
[15] Asadifard, R., Khoshnevis, Y., & Khaledi, A. (2018).  “Bozorag e Merrikh Koockak e Venosi” (Note: “Bozorag e Merrikh Koockak e Venosi” means “The Big from Mars, The Little from Venues” and it refers to the challenges in technological partnership between new technology-based start-ups and large indust, Tehran: Rasa. {In Persian}
[16] Nozari, M., Radfar, R., Ghazinoori, S., & Towfighi, J. (2021) Analysis of Foreign Investment Contracts in the Oil Industry from the Perspective of Technological Learning, Quarterly Energy Economics Review (QEER), 16(67), 87-115. {In Persian}
[17] AUTM U.S. (2013) licensing activity survey: FY2012 highlights., Online (behind paywall). http://www.autm.net/resources-surveys/research-reports-databases/licensing-surveys/archived-licensing-surveys/.
[18] Anderson, M., Ronning, E., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: scientists’ subscription to norms of research The Journal of higher education, 81(3), 366–393.
[19] Segatto-Mendes, A., & Mendes, N. (2006). University-Industry technological cooperation for energy efficiency: a case study. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 3, 31–45.
[20] Wayne, K. (2010) Determinants of commercial innovation for university technology transfer. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, 2, 1.
[21] Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., & Healey, P. (1998). Capitalizing knowledge: new intersections of industry and academia. suny Press.
[22] Powers, J.  (2003) Commercializing academic research: resurce effects on performance of university technology transfer. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(1), 26–50.
[23] Audretsch, D. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313-321.
[24] Freeman, C. (1995). The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of economics, 19(1), 5-24.
[25] Blumenthal, D., Causino, N., Campbell, E., & Louis, K. (1996). Relationships between academic institutions and industry in the life sciences an industry survey N Engl. New England Journal of Medicine, 334(6), 368-374.
[26] York, A., & Ahn, M. J. (2012). University technology transfer office success factors: a comparative case study. International journal of technology transfer and commercialisation, 11(1-2), 26–50.
[27] Barjak, F., Arundel, A., Es-Sadki, N., Perrett, P. J., Samuel, O., & Lilischkis, S. Knowledge Transfer Study 2010–2012. Final Report to the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation.
[28] Lambert, R. (2003). Lambert review of business-university collaboration. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
[29] Laurensen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33(8), 1201–1215.
[30] Carlsson, B., & Fridh, A. C. (2002). Technology transfer in United States universities-a survey and statistical analysis, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(1), 199-232.
[31] Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Mass Media Research: An Introduction 10th Edition. Cengage Learning.
[32] Faghihi, A., Chegini, R., & Aghaz, A. (2013). Case Study in Organizational Studies: a case of nongovernmental organization. Iranian journal of management sciences, 8(29), 2-23. {in Persian}
[33] Gall, M., Gall, J., & ROG, W. B. (2003). Educational Research (7th ed.). White Plains,, NY: Pearson Education.
[34] Yin, R. K. (2009).  Case study research: Design and methods (4th editin). Los Angeles and London: SAGE.
[35] Nozari, M., Radfar, R., Ghazinoori, S., & Towfighi, J. (2020). A Technological Learninig Model for Iran's buy-back Contracts: Case of North Azadegan Field Development. Journal of Energy Planning and Policy Research, 6(1), 149-193. {in Persian}
[36] Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982) Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ, 30(4), 233-252.
[37] Asadifard, A., & Khaledi, A. (2019). Challenges of Asymmetric Technological Collaboration between Large Companies and Small Nanotechnology-Based Small Companies. Journal of Science &Technology Policy, 11(3), 15-31. {In Persian}
[38] O’Shea, R P., Allen, T. J, Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994-1009.
[39] Hellerstedt, K., Wennberg, K., & Frederiksen, L. (2014). University knowledge spillovers and regional start-up rates: supply and demand-side factors.  In Academic entrepreneurship: creating an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.