ناکارآمدی علوم انسانی در دانشگاه های ایران بر اساس تجربه زیسته دانشجویان: یک پژوهش پدیدارشناختی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد برنامه ریزی درسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران

2 دکترای برنامه ریزی درسی، شرکت ملی نفت ایران، تهران.

3 استاد فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران

10.22034/jstp.2021.14.2.1349

چکیده

حوزه علوم انسانی که از مبانی فکری و فلسفی آغاز شده و تا کاربردی‌ترین دانش‌های مورد‌نیاز بشری امتداد یافته، به عنوان یکی از زیرساخت‌های مهم علمی، رابطه‌ نزدیکی با مفهوم توسعه و پیشرفت دارد که بدون در نظر گرفتن این حوزه، مسیر علم و پیشرفت کند خواهد بود. هدف این مقاله، مطالعه تجربه زیسته­ دانشجویان پیرامون علل ناکارآمدی علوم انسانی در دانشگاه‌های ایران می­باشد که از روش پدیدارشناسی و مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته استفاده شده است، مشارکت‌کنندگان پژوهش از دانشجویان دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه تهران و به روش هدفمند انتخاب شدند.  ابزار پژوهش، مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته بوده و جمع‌آوری داده‌ها در پنجاه‌وپنج مصاحبه به اشباع رسید. یافته‌ها حاکی از آن است که ناکارآمدی علوم انسانی در گرو عدم اعتلای دستاوردهای علمی و پژوهشی آن، عدم توجه کافی به رشته علوم انسانی در بحث سیاست‌گذاری‌های کشوری و نبود بینش وسیع و جامع در حوزه علوم انسانی است. این موارد بیانگر وابستگی کامل علوم انسانی به نهادهای سیاست‌گذار است.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Inefficiency of Humanities in Iranian Universities, Based on Students' Lived Experience; A Phenomenological Research

نویسندگان [English]

  • Batoul Beheshti 1
  • Saeed Safaei Movahed 2
  • Khosro Bagheri 3
1 M.A. of Curriculum Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Ph.D. of Curriculum Studies, National Iranian Oil Company, Tehran, Iran.
3 Professor, Dep. of Psychology and Education, Tehran University ,Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

the field of humanities has started from intellectual and philosophical foundations and has extended to the most practical human needs and has a close relationship with the concept of development and progress. The purpose of this study is to study the life experience of students about the causes of inefficiency of humanities in Iranian universities. Phenomenology and semi-structured interviews were used. The research participants, students of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, were selected by purposive sampling. The research tool was a semi-structured interview and data collection was saturated in fifty-five interviewees. Findings indicate that the inefficiency of humanities depends on the lack of promotion of its scientific and research achievements, insufficient attention to the field of humanities in the discussion of national policies and the lack of broad and comprehensive insights in the field of humanities. These cases indicate the complete dependence of the humanities on policy-making institutions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Inefficiency of Humanities
  • Iranian Universities
  • Students
  • Phenomenological
1[ Khoshnevesan, F, Abbaspour, A, Fazeli, N, and Neyestani, Mohammad , R, (2018), Requirements and Challenges of Entrepreneurial Humanities in the Iranian University System: A Phenomenological Analysis of the Humanities, Quarterly Journal of Cultural Sociology, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies , 9(3), pp. 30 – 1.
]2[ Ghazinoory, S., and Tavassoli Zadeh, S. (2008). Assessing NINI (National Iranian Nanotechnology Initiative) by BSC; & Explaining The Role of “Social Capital” As a Missing Link In NIS Theory. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 1(4), 49-59. {In Persian}.
]3[ Bazargan, A, (2012), Qualitative and mixed research methods; Tehran: Didar Publications.
]4[ Abedi, H, (2010), Application of Phenomenological Research Method in Clinical Sciences, Cultural Strategy Quarterly, No. 54, pp. 207-224
]5[ Golkar, R, Nasrasfahani,  A, Nili, Mohammad, (2020), Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education,  Page 26, Number 2, pp. 10.
]6[ Kafi, M, (2010), Sociology of History and Historiography, Quarterly Journal of Islamic History, Tenth Year, No. 3.
]7[ Mathematics, Abdul Mahdi, (2008). Increase the impact factor of humanities research: proposing an impact model. National Congress of Humanities: Today's situation, tomorrow's perspective. Tehran: 22.24 March.
]8[ Hamdipour, A, Zavareghi, R and Moradi, S (2015), Pathology of Knowledge Empowerment Challenges of Humanities Professors, University of Tabriz, Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, Volume 44, Number 11, Page 34.1.
]9[ Pariad, R and Maleki ,B, (2014), Research in Humanities, National Congress of Humanities Case Study: Iran, National Congress of Humanities Today, Tomorrow Outlook, Tehran.
]10[ Sajjadian, M, (2011). The role of universities and educational institutions in the promotion of humanities. National Congress of Humanities.
]11[ Beheshti, B (2016), Identifying the Perception and Interpretation of Students in the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran on the Islamization of Higher Education Curricula: A Phenomenological Research, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Tehran.
]12[ Nazemi, S, (2010). Time for Awakening, Surah Magazine, Winter 88, Namber. 45.
]13[ Ghanei Rad, M, (2013). Indicators of Technology and Innovation Audit in the field of humanities, published document, Vice President for Science and Technology.
]14[ Barzegar, I, (2014). Humanities Localization Approach, Humanities Methodology Quarterly, Namber. 63, Summer.
]15[ Hassani, S, H, (2010). Analysis of the mechanism of ijtihad as a model for the production of Islamic humanities, Proceedings of the Conference on the production of science and software movement in the field of Islamic education, Namber. 1, Spring.
]16[ Hooker, M. (1997),The Transformation of Higher Education, in D. Oblinger, and S. C. Rush (eds). The Learning Revolution, Bolton, MA:Anker Publishing  Company, INC .      
]17[ Lankard, B. A. (1994), The Place of the Humanities in Continuing Higher Education. ERIC Digest No. 145.
]18[ Kerr, C. (1994), Troubled Times for American Higher Education:The 1990s and Beyond , Albany:State University of New York Press , p. 51.
]19[ Zgodavova,K,(2010), Critical.success factors of research and education process at Slovak university of  trancin, Slovak, Creative April 26.
]20[ Majumder M.A. (2004). Issues and priorities of medical education research in Asia. Ann Acad Med Singapore; 33(2): 257-63
]21[ Arefi, M (2013). Strategic lesson planning in higher education. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti Publications.
]22[ Azizi, N (2013), Pathology of research inefficiency in humanities. The first international conference on higher education. Kurdistan University 27 and 28.
]23[ Afshani, A, (2016), Commercialization of Humanities; Opportunity or Threat, Etemad Newspaper, p.7.
]24[ Mir Bagheri, S,M, (2012), Discourses on Transformation in the Humanities Qom. Fajr Province.
]25[ Hosseini, S. H, (2014), Programs, Objectives and Approaches of the Council for the Study of Texts and Books of Humanities, Tehran, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
]26[Goodarzi,GH,)2015(,Prioritization,ofHumanities,Transformation Management Requirements Based on Islamic and Iranian Strategic Management, 3rd International Congress of Islamic Humanities.
]27[ Sekaran, Uma. (1996). Research Methods for Business, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
]28[ Khan Mohammadi, K,  (2014). A Study of the Process of Islamization of Universities in Iran: With a Cultural Policy Approach, Quarterly Journal of Islamic University, Tenth Year, No. 32, pp. 122-81 .
]29[ Abu al-Ma'ali, Kh, (2012). Qualitative research methods from theory to practice, Tehran: Alam Publishing.
]30[ Strauss, A. And c. Carbin (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research, techniques and stages of production of grounded theory. Tehran: Ney.
]31[ Yeo, A. Y. C. (2003). Examining a Singapore bank's competitive superiority using importance-performance analysis. Journal of American Academy of Business, 3(1/2),155-161.
]32[ Patton, M. Q. (1990). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualita, tive analysis. Health services research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189.
]33[ Delaware, A (2012). Research Method, Tehran:  : Editing Publishing.
]34[ Abedi, H, (2010), Application of Phenomenological Research Method in Clinical Sciences, Cultural Strategy Quarterly, No. 54, pp. 207-224.