عوامل موثر بر تقویت روابط در شبکه‌های همکاری از نگاه سرمایه اجتماعی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری سیاستگذاری علم و فناوری دانشگاه تهران، تهران

2 عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه تهران، تهران

3 عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس

4 عضو هیئت علمی پژوهشکده مطالعات فناوری، تهران

10.22034/jstp.2020.12.3.1228

چکیده

بسیاری از سرمایه‌‌‌‌گذاری‌ها بر روی تحقیق و توسعه، با هدف تحریک شکل‌‌‌‌گیری روابط همکاری انجام شده و باعث بهبود معنادار رشد اقتصادی و عملکرد نظام ملی نوآوری شده است. تاکنون مطالعات متعددی در زمینه روابط بین اعضای شبکه‌‌‌‌ها صورت گرفته است اما خلأهایی از قبیل عدم توجه کافی به بازیگران دولتی در این مطالعات دیده می‌شود. این پژوهش به دنبال ارائه الگویی برای تقویت روابط بین اعضای شبکه‌های همکاری علم و فناوری مبتنی بر نظریه سرمایه اجتماعی در ایران است، به طوری که ماهیت اعضای شبکه از نظر دولتی و خصوصی بودن نیز در نظر گرفته شود. جامعه پژوهش حاضر، اعضای شبکه آزمایشگاهی فناوری نانو در ایران و روش پژوهش مطالعه موردی است. در گام اول عوامل مؤثر بر تقویت روابط در بین اعضای شبکه از طریق مرور ادبیات (مربوط به نظریه سرمایه اجتماعی) شناسایی و به وسیله اجماع خبرگان تعدیل شد. در گام بعد این عوامل با استفاده از مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری در ترکیب‌های سه‌‌‌‌گانه خصوصی-خصوصی، خصوصی-دولتی و دولتی-دولتی اولویت‌‌‌‌بندی و مقایسه گردید. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌‌‌‌دهد که عوامل برنامه‌‌‌‌ها و سیاست‌های مدیریت شبکه، تجربه روابط پیشین و مدت زمان عضویت، سه عامل ریشه‌‌‌‌ای در ترکیبات مختلف دولتی- دولتی، خصوصی- دولتی و خصوصی- خصوصی هستند. همچنین عامل برنامه‌‌‌‌ها و سیاست‌‌‌‌های اعضای شبکه نیز در ترکیب دولتی- دولتی عاملی ریشه‌‌‌‌ای و تأثیرگذار است.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effective Factors of Strengthening the Relationships between the Members of Collaborative Networks from the Social Capital Perspective

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamed Mazarei 1
  • Fatemeh Saghafi 2
  • Mohammad Khansari 2
  • Hannaneh Mohammadi Kangarani 3
  • Reza Asadifard 4
1 Ph.D. of S&T Policy, University of Tehran,Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Faculty Member, Hormozgan University, Bandar Abbas, Iran
4 Faculty Member, Technology Studies Institute, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Many investments in research and development have been made to stimulate the formation of cooperative relations and have significantly improved economic growth and the performance of the national innovation system. Numerous studies have already been conducted on relationships between members of the networks; however, there are gaps such as insufficient attention to government actors in these studies. The present study seeks to develop a model for strengthening relationships between the members of social capital theory-oriented collaborative networks of science and technology in Iran so that the nature of members of the network also considered in terms of their being public or private. It is a case study, and the members of the nanotechnology laboratory network are the statistical population. In the first step, factors that influence the strengthening of relationships between the members of the network were identified through a literature review (Related to social capital theory) and adjusted by the experts’ consensus. Then using the interpretive structural modeling, those factors were compared and prioritized within ternary compositions of private-private, private-public, and public-public. The results show that the factors of programs and policies of network management, the experience of previous relationships, and the duration of membership are three radical factors in different compositions of public-public, private-public, and private-private. Also, the factor of programs and policies of network members is a radical and influential one in the public-public composition.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Collaborative Networks
  • Relationships Between Members
  • Interpretive Structural Modeling
  • Case Study
  • Social Capital Theory

مراجع

[1] Büchel, B. and S. Raub. (2002). Building Knowledge-creating Value Networks. European Management Journal, 20(6): 587-596.
[2] Lopez, A. (2008). Determinants of R&D Cooperation: Evidence from Spanish Manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 26(1): 113-136.
[3] Fischer, M.M. and A. Varga. (2002). Technological Innovation and Interfirm Cooperation. An Exploratory Analysis Using Survey Data from Manufacturing Firms in the Metropolitan Region of Vienna. International Journal of Technology Management, 24(7): 724-742
[4] Asadifard, R. and S. Mazarei. (2019). Analyzing the Intra-network Relationships of the Members of Science and Technology Collaborative Networks using Social Networks Analysis (Case study: Iran Nanotechnology Laboratory Network). Public Policy. 5(1): 117-145.
[5] Asadifard, R, Tabatabaeian, S. Sofi, J. and Taghva, M. (2016). A Model for Investigating the Stability Factors in Formal Science and Technology Collaborative Networks: A Case Study of Iran. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
[6] Hagedoorn, J., N. Roijakkers, and H. Van Kranenburg. (2006). Inter‐Firm R&D Networks: the Importance of Strategic Network Capabilities for High‐Tech Partnership Formation. British Journal of Management. 17(1): 39-53.
[7] Bourdieu, P. (2011). The Forms of Capital.(1986). Cultural Theory: An Anthology. 1: 81-93.
[8] Coleman, J.S. (1988). SocialCapital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology. 94: 95-120.
[9] Putnam, R.D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy. 6(1): 65-78.
[10] Nahapiet, J. and S. Ghoshal. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review. 23(2): 242-266.
[11] Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon & schuster.
[12] Chassagnon, V. (2014). Consummate Cooperation in the Network-firm: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Findings. European Management Journal. 32(2): 260-274.
[13] Filieri, R. McNally, R. O'Dwyer, M and O'Malley, L. (2014). Structural Social Capital Evolution and Knowledge Transfer: Evidence from an Irish Pharmaceutical Network. Industrial Marketing Management. 43(3): 429-440.
[14] Molina‐Morales, F.X. and M.T. Martínez‐Fernández. (2010). Social Networks: Effects of Social Capital on Firm Innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(2): 258-279.
[15] Eklinder-Frick, J., L.-T. Eriksson, and L. Hallén. (2011). Bridging and Bonding Forms of Social Capital in a Regional Strategic Network. Industrial Marketing Management. 40(6): 994-1003.
[16] De Sousa, A.G., M.J. Braga, and L.F. Meyer. (2015). Impact of Cooperation on the R&D Activities of Brazilian Firms. Procedia Economics and Finance. 24: 172-181.
[17] Cappiello, G., F. Giordani, and M. Visentin. (2020). Social Capital and its Effect on Networked Firm Innovation and Competitiveness. Industrial Marketing Managemen. 422-430
[18] Tavassoli, G. and A. Amanikalarijani. (1391). Social Capital In Virtual Social Networks (Social Networking). Journal of cultural management. 6(17). 55-70. {In Persian}.
[19] Tabatabaeian, H., Bamdad soofi, J., Taghva, M. R., & Asadifard, R. (2011). Structural Typology of the Formal S&T Collaborative Networks in Iran: a Multiple-case Study. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 3(3). 61-78. {In Persian}.
[20] Tagliaventi, M.R., F. Bertolotti, and D.M. Macrì. (2010). A Perspective on Practice in Interunit Knowledge Sharing. European Management Journal,. 28(5): 331-345.
[21] Han, J.H., J.d. Lee, and B.S. Yoon. (2008). An Empirical Study on the Network Properties of Innovation in Clusters: The Social Capital Aspect. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation. 16(2): 47-66.
[22] Uzzi, B. (1997). Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative science quarterly. 42(1): 35-67.
[23] Rutten, R. and F. Boekema. (2007). Regional Social Capital: Embeddedness, Innovation Networks and Regional Economic Development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 74(9): 1834-1846.
[24] Western, J., Stimson, R. Baum, S. and Van Gellecum, Y. (2005). Measuring Community Strength and Social Capital. Regional studies. 39(8): 1095-1109.
[25] Annen, K. (2003). Social Capital, Inclusive Networks, and Economic Performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 50(4): 449-463.
[26] Inkpen, A.C. and E.W. Tsang. (2005). Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer. Academy of management review. 30(1): 146-165.
[27] Liao, J. and H. Welsch. (2003). Social Capital and Entrepreneurial Growth Aspiration: a Comparison of Technology-and non-technology-based Nascent Entrepreneurs. The Journal of High Technology Management Research. 14(1): 149-170.
[28] Mandarano, L.A. (2009). Social Network Analysis of Social Capital in Collaborative Planning. Society and Natural Resources. 22(3): 245-260.
[29] Dhanaraj, C. and A. Parkhe. (2006). Orchestrating Innovation Networks. Academy of Management Review. 31(3): 659-669.
[30] Ingram, P. and P.W. Roberts. (2000). Friendships among Competitors in the Sydney Hotel Industry. American Journal of Sociology. 106(2): 387-423.
[31] Cohen, S.S. and G. Fields. (1999). Social Capital and Capital Gains in Silicon Valley. California management review. 41(2): 108-130.
[32] Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology, in Network and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action. Harvard Business School Press. 25-56.
[33] Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural hole. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA. 42(2): 339-365
[34] Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Vol. 1: Cambridge University Press.
[35] Walker, G., B. Kogut, and W. Shan. (2000). Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network, in Knowledge and Social Capital, Elsevier. 225-254.
[36] Marsden, P.V. (1987). Core Discussion Networks of Americans. American Sociological Review. 52(1): 122-131.
[37] Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly. 45(3): 425-455.
[38] Trotter, R.T., Briody, E. Sengir, G. and Meerwarth, T. (2008). The Life Cycle of Collaborative Partnerships: Evolution of Structure and Roles in Industry University Research Networks. Analysis of Transitivity and Reciprocity in Online Distance Learning Networks. 28(1): 40-58
[39] Azar, A., F. Khosravani, and R. Jalali. (1392). Soft Operations Research: Problem Structuring Approaches. Tehran: Industrial Management Institute. {In Persian}.
[40] Lefebvre, V.M., Sorenson, D. Henchion, M. and Gellynck, X. (2016). Social Capital and Knowledge Sharing Performance of Learning Networks. International Journal of Information Management, 36(4): 570-579.
 
 

فایل ها

همرسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار