[1] https://www.stemwomen.co.uk/blog/2019/09/women-in-stem-percentages-of-women-in-stem-statistics
[2] Wajman, J. (2006). TechnoCapitalism Meets TechnoFeminism: Women and Technology in a Wireless World. Labour & Industry, 16(3), 7-20.
[3] Jensen, H. (2007). The United Nations World Summit on the Information Society: Empowering Women as Shapers of the Information Society?. In Gender Designs IT (pp. 33-50). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
[4] Perez, C. C. (2019). Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. Random House.
[5] Achterhuis, H. J. (2001). American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn. Indiana University Press.
[6] Noble, D. (1992). A World Without Women: The Christian Clerical Culture of Western Science. Oxford University Press, New York. 248.
[7] Oudshoorn, N., Rommes, E., and Stienstra, M. (2004). Configuring the user as everybody: Gender and cultures of design in information and communication technologies. Science, Technology & Human Values, 29 (1), 30-64.
[8] Dusek, V. (2006). Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. Chincester: John Wiley and Sons.
[9] Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., & Borning, A. (2008). Value sensitive design and information systems. The handbook of information and computer ethics, 69-101.
[10] Van de Poel, I., & Royakkers, L. (2011). Ethics, technology and engineering. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 72
[11] Eisensten, I. (1979). Capitalist Partiarchy and the Case for Social Feminism. CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.
[12] Collins, P. (1990). Black Feminist Thought, Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. Washington. DC: Georgetown Universtiy Press.
[13] Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: what is “strong objectivity?”‘in L. Alcoff and E. Potter (eds) Feminist Epistemologies, London: Routledge.
[14] Harding, S. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Cornell University Press, New York.
[15] Oldenziel, R. (1999). Making Technology Masculine: Men, Women and Modern Machines in America. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
[16] Cockburn, C. (1983) Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change. Pluto Press, London.
[17] Cockburn, C. (1985). Machinery of Dominance: Women, Men and Technical Know-How. Pluto Press, London.
[18] Game, A., & Pringle, R. (1983). Gender at Work. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
[19] Karpf, A., & McNeil, M. (1987). Recent feminist approaches to women and technology. Gender and Expertise. London: Free Association Books, 158-170.
[20] Bührer, S., & Schraudner, M. (2006). Gender-Aspekte in der Forschung. Wie können Gender-Aspekte in Forschungsvorhaben erkannt und bewertet werden.
[21] Jones, S. (1991). Why do we want to see more women in computing?. In Women into Computing (pp. 59-65). Springer, London.
[22] Colmo, A. C., Elshtain, J. B., Nichols, M. P., & Harvey, A. J. (1996). Finding a new feminism: rethinking the woman question for liberal democracy. Rowman & Littlefield.
[23] Berg, A. (1999). A gendered socio-technical construction, The smart house. In: Wajcman, J., and MacKenzie, D. (eds.). The Social Shaping of Technolog, 2nd ed. Buckingham, UK/Philadelphia: Open University Press, 301-313.
[24] Alan, D., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., and Beale, R. (2000). Human-Computer Interaction. NewYork: Prentice Hall.
[25] https://www.womentech.net/women-technology-statistics
[26] https://www.statista.com/statistics/784647/tech-industry-workforce-diversity-gender
[27] Kahn, S., & Ginther, D. (2017). Women and STEM (No. w23525). National Bureau of Economic Research.
[28] Brizendine, L. (2010). The Male Brain: A Breakthrough Understanding of How Men and Boys Think. Potter/Ten Speed/Harmony/Rodale.
[29] Roeser, S. (2011). Moral Emotions and Intuitions. Palgrave Macmillan.
[30] Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39, 751-576.
[31] Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. J., & Borning, A. (2006). Value sensitive design and information systems.
[32] Van den Hoven, J. (2007). ICT and value sensitive design. In The information society: Innovation, legitimacy, ethics and democracy in honor of Professor Jacques Berleur SJ (pp. 67-72). Springer, Boston, MA.
[33] Gilligan, C. (1982). In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Human-computer interaction in management information systems. Foundation, 5, 348-372.
[34] Harcourt, W. (1994). Feminist Perspectives on Sustainable Development. International Society for Development.
[35] Wright, D. (2014). Ethical impact assessment. In Britt Holbrook, J. & Mitcham, C. (Eds.). Ethics, science, technology and engineering: A global resource (2nd ed., pp. 163–167). Farmington Hills: Macmillan Reference.
[36] Bath, C. (2009). Searching for methodology: Feminist technology design in computer science. Proceedings of GICT 2009. Retrieved from http://elib.suub.unibremen.de/ip/docs/00010427.pdf
[37] Parsheera, S. (2018, November). A Gendered Perspective on Artificial Intelligence. In 2018 ITU Kaleidoscope: Machine Learning for a 5G Future (ITU K) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
[38] Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT press.
[39] Glenn, M. (2017). Few Good Men: Why is the growing population of AI voices predominantly female?. IMB Blog, 2 Mar. Available at http://www.ibm.com/blogs/insights-on-business/ibmix/good-men-growing-population-ai-voices-predominantly-female/
[40] Marchetti-Bowick, M. (2009). Is your roomba male or female? The role of gender stereotypes and cultural norms in robot design. Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology, and Society, 2(1), 90-103.
[41] Morse, J. (2017). Google Translate might have a gender problem. Mashable.
[42] Economist. (2018). For artificial intelligence to thrive, it must explain itself, 15 Feb 2018. Available at http://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2018/02/15/for-artificial-intelligence-to-thrive-it-must-explain-itself.
[43] Martínez, J., & Reilly, K. (2002). Looking Behind the Internet: Empowering Women for Public Policy Advocacy in Central America. UN INSTRAW Virtual Seminar Series on Gender and ICTs, Seminar Four: ICTs as Tools for Bridging the Gender Digital Divide and Women’s Empowerment (2-14 September 2002).
)