چالشهای همکاری فناورانه‌ نامتقارن شرکتهای بزرگ با شرکتهای کوچک فناوری‌محور نانو

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیئت علمی پژوهشکده مطالعات فناوری، تهران

2 پژوهشگر پژوهشکده مطالعات فناوری، تهران

چکیده

تغییرات فضای کسب‌وکار در طی سال‌های اخیر باعث شده که بسیاری از شرکت‌های بزرگ به دنبال همکاری فناورانه با شرکت‌های کوچک فناوری‌محور باشند. با وجود مزایای زیاد این نوع همکاری‌ها -که در ادبیات به همکاری‌های نامتقارن شناخته شده‌اند- طرفین همواره با چالش‌های متعددی روبه‌رو می‌شوند. با این حال در مطالعات قبلی کمتر به چالش‌های همکاری نامتقارن به‌ویژه در بافت کشورهای در حال توسعه پرداخته شده‌است. مقاله حاضر با رویکردی ترکیبی به دنبال شناسایی چالش‌های همکاری فناورانه نامتقارن در بخش نانوی ایران است. در ابتدا با بررسی ادبیات و انجام مصاحبه‌ با افراد متخصص، فهرست چالش‌های اصلی همکاری شناسایی و براساس چهار گروه بازیگر اصلی فرآیند همکاری فناورانه (شرکت‌های بزرگ صنعتی، شرکت‌های کوچک دارنده فناوری، واسطه‌های تبادل فناوری و نهادهای تسهیل‌گر) دسته‌بندی شدند. سپس پرسشنامه‌ای براساس چالش‌های مورد نظر طراحی و در بین چهار دسته بازیگران فعال در زمینه همکاری فناورانه‌ نامتقارن در بخش نانو ایران توزیع گردید که در نهایت 52 پرسشنامه تکمیل گردید. نتایج حاکی از آن است که چهار دسته بازیگر درگیر در فرآیند همکاری، در مورد 11 چالش اختلاف‌نظر دارند. همچنین مشخص شد که برخلاف ادبیات جهانی در بخش نانوی ایران، «سوءاستفاده‌ شرکت کوچک از برند شرکت بزرگ» به عنوان چالش همکاری مطرح نیست. علاوه بر این، چالش‌هایی از قبیل ضعف فرهنگ همکاری و فقدان زیرساخت‏های به‌هم‌رسانی نیز شناسایی شدند که در ادبیات مربوط به کشورهای توسعه‌یافته به آن‌ها اشاره نشده‌ بود.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Challenges of Asymmetric Technological Collaboration between Large Companies and Nanotechnology Startups

نویسندگان [English]

  • Reza Asadifard 1
  • Arman Khaledi 2
1 Assistant Professor, Technology Studies Institute, Tehran, Iran
2 Researcher, Technology Studies Institute, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Significant changes in the business environment have led many large companies to tend to asymmetric technological collaboration with startups. Despite several benefits of these collaborations for both sides, they may face many challenges in their Partnership. These challenges have rarely been uncovered in the previous studies particularly in the context of developing countries. We utilized a mixed research method to explore collaboration challenges in Iran. Firstly, we prepared a list of main collaboration challenges through investigating the literature and in depth Interviews with key informants. Secondly, we conducted a survey using a questionnaire and received 52 responds from related people to asymmetric collaboration projects. The results showed that actors involved in the collaboration process disagree on 11 challenges. We also found that contraty on the literature “misusing the large company's brand” is not a challenging issue for the collaboration in nano sector of Iran. In addition, some new challenges were identified for asymmetric collaboration that was not mentioned in literature, including; weak collaboration culture, and lack of matchmaking infrasctures.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • asymmetric technological collaboration
  • NTBF
  • Industrial large companies

مراجع

[1] Nijssen, E. J., Van Reekum, R., & Hulshoff, H. E. (2001). Gathering and Using Information for the Selection of Technology Partners. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 67(2), 221-237.

[2]           Christensen, J. L., Schibany, A., & Vinding, A. L. (2001). Collaboration Between Manufacturing Firms and Knowledge Institutions on Product Development: Evidence from Harmonised Surveys in Australia, Austria, Denmark, Norway and Spain. Innovative Networks, Co-Operation in National Innovation Systems, 253-278.

[3]           Chen, D., & Karami, A. (2010). Critical Success Factors for Inter-firm Technological cooperation: an empirical study of high-tech SMEs in China. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(2-4), 282-299.

[4]           Oughton, D., Mortara, L., & Minshall, T. (2013). Managing Asymmetric Relationships in Open Innovation: Lessons from Multinational Companies and SMEs Open Innovation in the Food and Beverage Industry (pp. 276-293) Woodhead Publishing..

[5]           Rothwell, R., & Dodgson, M. (1994). Innovation and Size of Firm. The handbook of industrial innovation, 310-324.

[6]           Coviello, N. E., & McAuley, A. (1999). Internationalisation and the Smaller Firm: A Review of Contemporary Empirical Research. MIR: management international review, 223-256.

[7]           Oughton, D., Mortara, L., & Minshall, T. (2013). Managing Asymmetric Relationships in Open Innovation: Lessons from Multinational Companies and SMEs Open Innovation in the Food and Beverage Industry (pp. 276-293) Woodhead Publishing.

 [8]          Hogenhuis, B. N., van den Hende, E. A., & Hultink, E. J. (2016). When Should Large Firms Collaborate with Young Ventures? Understanding Young firms’ Strengths Can Help Firms Make the Right Decisions Around Asymmetric Collaborations. Research-Technology Management, 59(1), 39-47.

[9]           Minshall, T., Mortara, L., Valli, R., & Probert, D. (2010). Making “Asymmetric” Partnerships Work. Research-Technology Management, 53(3), 53-63.

[10]         Bannerjee, S., Bielli, S., & Haley, C. (2016). Scaling Together: Overcoming Barriers in Corporate-stratup Collaboration. London: Nesta.

[11]         Kumar, R. (2014). Managing Ambiguity in Strategic Alliances. California Management Review, 56(4), 82-102.

[12]         Nielsen, B. B. (2007). Determining International Strategic Alliance Performance: A Multidimensional Approach. International Business Review, 16(3), 337-361.

[13]         Franco, M. (2011). Determining Factors in The Success of Strategic Alliances: An Empirical Study Performed in Portuguese Firms. European Journal of International Management, 5(6), 608-632.

[14]         Kogut, B. (1988). Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Strategic management journal, 9(4), 319-332.

[15]         Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (2002). Alliance Capability, Stock Market Response, and Long‐term Alliance Success: The Role of the Alliance Function. Strategic management journal, 23(8), 747-767.

[16]         Weiblen, T., & Chesbrough, H. W. (2015). Engaging with Startups to Enhance Corporate Innovation. California Management Review, 57(2), 66-90.

[17]         Zhang, A. (2014). Collaboration in the Australian and Chinese Mobile Telecommunication Markets. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.

 [18]        Sawers, J. L., Pretorius, M. W., & Oerlemans, L. A. (2008). Safeguarding SMEs Dynamic Capabilities in Technology Innovative SME-large Company Partnerships in South Africa. Technovation, 28(4), 171-182.

[19] UNCTAD. (2016). Science, Technology & Innovation Policy Review: Islamic Republic of Iran. Switzerland: UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION.

[20]         Salehi Yazdi, F., Sepehri, M. M., & Bahraini, M. A. (2011). Study of Scientific-Technical Cooperation Space of Nano Companies in Iran Using Social Networking Theory and Referring to Experts. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 3(3), 60-49, {In Persian}.

[21]         Nilforoushan, H., & Arasti, M. R. (2014). The Weak Failure Process of Engineered Innovation Networks in the Initiation Phase: The Case Study of Gas Industry in Iran. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 6(2), 177-113. {In Persian}.

[22]         Duysters, G., & Hagedoorn, J. (2000). Organizational Modes of Strategic Technology Partnering. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 59(8/9), 640-649.

[23]         Khaledi, A., Elahi, S., Majidpour, M., & Asadifard, R. (2018). Driving and Restraining Forces Technological Collaboration Between Large and Small Technology Based Firms. Journal of Innovation and Enterpreneurship,  2, 7(13), 79-104.

[24]         Hoffmann, W. H., & Schlosser, R. (2001). Success Factors of Strategic Alliances in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: An Empirical Survey. Long range planning, 34(3), 357-381.

[25]         Slowinski, G. (2005). Reinventing Corporate Growth: Implementing the Transformational Growth Model: Alliance Management Group.

[26]         Hogenhuis, B. N., Van Den Hende, E. A., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). Unlocking the Innovation Potential in Large Firms Through Timely and Meaningful Interactions with Young Ventures. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(01), 1750009.

[27]         Mueller, C., & Herstatt, C. (2000). Interfirm Cooperation: A Brief Overview of Current Theoretical Findings and Issues for Future Research. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 1(1), 48-67.

[28]         Gibson, T., & Van der Vaart, H. (2008). Defining SMEs: A less Imperfect Way of Defining Small and Medium Enterprises in Developing Countries.

[29]  Iran Chamber of Commerce, Industry and Mine, 2014, Report on Financing Small and Medium Enterprises, Tehran (In Persian).

[30]         Schoenmakers, W., & Duysters, G. (2006). Learning in Strategic Technology Alliances. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(2), 245-264.

[31]         Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering: Nterorganizational Modes of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences. Strategic management journal, 14(5), 371-385.

[32]         Schulze, A., & Brojerdi, G. J. C. (2012). The Effect of the Distance Between Partners' Knowledge Components on Collaborative Innovation. European Management Review, 9(2), 85-98.

[33]         Imaginatik, & Masschallenge. (2016). The State of Startup/Corporate Collaboration 2016.

[34]         Lindgreen, E. R., & Horn, D. (2015). On the Road to Corporatestartup Collaboration

[35]         Geum, Y., Lee, S., Yoon, B., & Park, Y. (2013). Identifying and Evaluating Strategic Partners for Collaborative R&D: Index-based Approach Using Patents and Publications. Technovation, 33(6), 211-224.

[36]         Gilabert, B. O. (2014). An Innovative Framework for Enhancing Inter-firm Collaboration in Forest Based Supply Chain.  

[37]         Alexy, O., Criscuolo, P., & Salter, A. (2009). Does IP Strategy Have to Cripple Open Innovation? MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(1), 71.

[38]         Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2014). The Challenge of Closing Open Innovation: The Intellectual Property Disassembly Problem. Research-Technology Management, 57(5), 19-25.

[39]         Katila, R., Rosenberger, J. D., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2008). Swimming With Sharks: Technology Ventures, Defense Mechanisms and Corporate Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2), 295-332.

فایل ها

اشتراک گذاری

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار