نسخه متنی مقاله

مناقشه بر سر کاربردی نبودن دانش دانشگاهی: به سوی نظریه "ساخت اجتماعی بهره‌برداری از دانش"

اطلاعات مقاله:
نویسندگان:
  • حسن  دانایی فرد

اطلاعات تماس:
  • حسن  دانایی فرد

    Affiliation:
    آدرس محل کار:
    تلفن محل کار:
    فکس:
    پست الکترونیک: danaei@
متن:
دانش تولیدی در حوزه علوم انسانی و اجتماعی امری اعتباری است زیرا فرآیند هرمنوتیک دوگانه یافتن قوانین لایتغیر در امور انسانی و اجتماعی را بسیار دشوار میسازد پژوهشهای انجامشده متعدد با رد جهانشمولی دانش تولیدی در عرصههای انسانی و اجتماعی و طرح بسترمندی چنین دانشی مهر تییدی بر ساخت اجتماعی دانش یا اعتباری بودن آن زدهاند اگر چه پژوهشهایی در باب صبغه ساخت اجتماعی و اعتباری دانش انجام شده ولی چندان به ساخت اجتماعی کاربست دانش یا اعتباری بودن استفاده از دانش توجه نشده است این نظریه مدعی است اگر چه دانشگاهها و مراکز پژوهشی در تولید دانش و بعضا بهرهبرداری از آن نقش ایفا میکنند ولی مقصر اصلی عدم کاربست دانش آکادمیک صرفا این محافل علمی نیستند نویسنده امیدوار است با پذیرش این نظریه سیاق گفتاری دانشپژوهان و خطمشیگذاران ملی در باب استفاده نکردن از دانش تولیدی دانشگاهی اثربخش در ایران قدری متحول شود
رفرانس :

[1] Danaeefard, H., & Kazemi, S. H. (1389). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (Tranlated from Neuman, W. L.). Tehran: Mehraban Publisher. {In Persian}.

[2] Danaeefard, H. (1395). Organization Theory: modern, postmodern, and symbolic perspectives (Tranlated from Hatch, M. J., & Cunliffe, A.). Tehran: Safar. {In Persian}.

[3] Caplan, N. (1979). The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. American Behavioral Scientist, 22(3), 459-470.

[4] Green, A., & Bennett, S. (2007). Sound choices: Enhancing capacity for evidence-informed health policy. World Health Organisation, Switzerland.

[5] Havelock, R. (1969). Planning for innovation through the dissemination and utilization of scientific knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: CRUSK, Institute for Social Research.

[6] Knott, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1980). If dissemination is the solution, what is the problem? Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(4), 537-578.

[7] Landry, R., Amara, N., & Lamari, M. (2001). Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Research Policy, 30, 333-349.

[8] Rich, R. F. (1979). The pursuit of knowledge. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(1), 6-30.

[9] Rich, R. F. (1997). Measuring knowledge utilization: Processes and outcomes. Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization, 10(3), 11-24.

[10] Lomas, J. (1990). Finding audiences, changing beliefs: the structure of research use in Canadian health policy. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 15(3), 525-542.

[11] Yin, R. K., & Moore, G. B., (1988). Lessons on the utilization of research from nine case experiences in the natural hazardsfield. Knowledge in Society: the International Journal of Knowledge Transfer, 1(3), 25-44.

[12] Rich, R. F., & Oh, C. H. (1993). The utilization of policy research. In Encyclopedia of Policy Studies. Nagel, S. Ed. 2nd Edn Marcel Dekkar, New York.

[13] Oh, C. H., & Rich, R. F. (1996). Explaining use of information in public policymaking. Knowledge and Policy, 9(1), 3-35.

[14] Miles, J. A. (2012). Management and organization theory. Translated by Danaeefard, H. Tehran: Mehraban Publisher.

[15] Danaeefard, H. (2012). Designing National Observatory of Management and Public Policy Lesson - Drawing of Iran: Theoretical Rationale, Operational Conceptualization and its Challenges. Journal of Sicence & Technology Policy, 4(4), 13-24. {In Persian}.

[16] Danaeefard, H., Sadeghi, H., & Mostefazadeh, M. (1394). Exploring and analyzing politicization of bureaucracy in political systems. Strategic Management Qurterly, 9(2), 57-86. {In Persian}.

[17] Peter, J. M., & Ashley, E. (2013). Policy regime perspectives: Policies, politics, and governing. Paper presented at the International Conference on public policy, 26-28 June 2013, Grenoble, France.

[18] Danaeefard, H. (2016). "The Getting Ride of" Public Policies in Iran: Conceptual Foundations, Charactrsitics, Antecedents and Concequences. Journal of Sicence & Technology Policy, 8(2), 79-96. {In Persian}.

[19] Hood, C., & Jackson, M. (1994). Keys for locks in administrative argument. Administration & society, 25(4), 467-488.

[20] Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of management review, 14(4), 516-531.

 

[21] Comelissen, J. P. (2006). CornelissenMaking sense of theory construction: Metaphor and disciplined imagination. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1579-1597.

[22] Pollitt, C. (1985). "Performance" in government and the public service. Paper presented to public administration committee. Conference, York, England. Pp 12-13.

[23] Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (2009). Social construction of reality. Encyclopedia of communication theory, 892-895.

[24] Kim, B. (2001). Social constructivism. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, 1-8.

[25] Hatch, M. J. (1997). Organization theory: modern, sympolic, postmodern. New York: Oxford University Press.

[26] Washington Jr, E. D. (2000). Knowing, believing, and understanding: The social construction of knowledge in the OJ Simpson criminal trial. Journal of Black Psychology, 26(3), 302-316.

[27] Ware, N. C., & Weiss, M. G. (1994). Neurasthenia and the social construction of psychiatric knowledge. Transcultural Psychiatric Research Review, 31(2), 101-124.

[Norma C. Ware

28] Winsor, D. A. (1990). The construction of knowledge in organizations: Asking the right questions about the Challenger. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 4(2), 7-20.

[29] Danaeefard, H. (1395). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic and postmodern. (Translated from Hatch, M. J., & Cunlif, A. L.). Tehran: Safar. p 102. {In Persian}.

[30] Ingram, H., Schneider, A. L., & DeLeon, P. (2007). Social construction and policy design. Theories of the policy process, 2, 93-126.

[31] Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Thesocial construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334-347.

[32] Van de Van, A. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Translated by Damnaeefard, H. (1390). Tehran: Safar.{In Persian}.

[33] Danaeefard, H. (2009). An analysis of generating knowldeg barriers in human resource science:implications for improving quality of Iranian sciemcecapacity. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 2(1), 1-16. {In Persian}.

[34] Danaeefard, H. (1395). Theory building: Founations and methodologies. Tehran: Samt. {In Persian}.

[35] Ions, E. (1977). Against Behaviouralism: A Critique of Behavioural Science. Oxford: Blackwell.

[36] Zey-Ferrell, M. (1981). Criticisms of the Dominant Perspective on Organizations. Sociological Quarterly, 22, 181–205.


[